Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2015 Mar 3;26(5):787–794. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0540-5

Table 2.

Odds ratio estimates of campaign effect on mammography uptake in the cities of Savannah and Macon compared with Columbus in the three campaign periods among African American and other (non-African American) women

Race/ethnicity City Period Point estimate (OR) 95 % CI p value
AA Savannah versus Columbus 2 versus 1 1.269 (1.005–1.602) 0.0449
3 versus 1 1.018 (0.779–1.330) 0.8968
3 versus 2 0.802 (0.624–1.030) 0.0842
Macon versus Columbus 2 versus 1 1.043 (0.809–1.345) 0.7450
3 versus 1 0.727 (0.539–0.982) 0.0375
3 versus 2 0.697 (0.525–0.925) 0.0125
Other Savannah versus Columbus 2 versus 1 1.014 (0.735–1.401) 0.9304
3 versus 1 1.026 (0.706–1.489) 0.8942
3 versus 2 1.011 (0.709–1.443) 0.9519
Macon versus Columbus 2 versus 1 1.137 (0.796–1.625) 0.4810
3 versus 1 1.088 (0.720–1.645) 0.6877
3 versus 2 0.958 (0.648–1.416) 0.8281

P1 = period 1 (8/08–1/09); P2 = period 2 (2/09–8/09); P3 = period 3 (9/09–12/09)

AA African American