Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Feb;175(2):257–265. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6888

Table 3.

Adjusted comparisons of material need insecurity with diabetes control and healthcare utilization

Poor Diabetes Controla
ORb (95% CI)
Outpatient Visits
IRRc (95% CI)
ED/Inpatient Visits
IRRc (95% CI)
Food Insecurity 1.97 (1.58 – 2.47) 1.19 (1.05 – 1.36) 1.00 (0.51 – 1.97)
No Food Insecurity 1.00 (--) 1.0 (--) 1.0 (--)

Cost-related Medication Underuse 1.91 (1.35 – 2.70) 1.07 (0.95 – 1.21) 1.68 (1.21 – 2.34)
No Cost-related Medication Underuse 1.00 (--) 1.0 (--) 1.0 (--)

Housing Instability 1.10 (0.60 – 2.02) 1.31 (1.14 – 1.51) 1.49 (0.81 – 2.73)
No Housing Instability 1.00 (--) 1.0 (--) 1.0 (--)

Energy Insecurity 1.27 (0.96 – 1.69) 1.12 (1.00– 1.25) 1.31 (0.80 – 2.13)
No Energy Insecurity 1.0 (--) 1.0 (--) 1.0 (--)
a

Composite of HbA1c > 9.0%, LDL cholesterol > 100mg/dL, or blood pressure > 140/90 mm/Hg

b

Odds Ratio (OR) adjusted for age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, insurance, health literacy, survey language, nativity, duration of diabetes, glycemic, cholesterol, and blood pressure medications, and clustering by clinic

c

Incidence Rate Ratio (IRR) adjusted for age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, insurance, health literacy, survey language, nativity, duration of diabetes, Charlson score, and clustering by clinic