Skip to main content
. 2015 May;60(5):215–222. doi: 10.1177/070674371506000503

Table 2.

Observational studies on antipsychotic polypharmacy and corrected QT (QTc) interval

Study Year Design Diagnosis Antipsychotic polypharmacy Antipsychotic monotherapy Group difference


n (male; female) Mean age, years Mean QTc, ms at mg/day n (male; female) Mean age, years Mean QTc, ms at mg/day
Mackin and Young26 2005 Cross-sectional n/a 12 (n/a; n/a) 45.3a 403 53 (n/a; n/a) 45.3a 416 ns
Correll et al27 2009 Cross-sectional n/a 38 (25; 13) 40.9 403 at 525b,c 73 (44; 29) 44.5 408 at 245b,c ns
Ramos-Ríos et al28 2010 Cross-sectional Sz 137 (n/a; n/a) 55.8a n/a 34 (n/a; n/a) 55.8a n/a nsd
Di Sciascio et al29 2011 Prospective Sz and BD 42 (30; 12) 36.0 369 at 477b to 387 at 845b
s
33 (25; 8) 39.2 365 at 398b to 363 at 449b
ns
n/a
a

For whole patients

b

Mean chlorpromazine-equivalent dose

c

All patients were treated with atypical antipsychotics

d

The number of antipsychotics did not significantly predict QTc interval.

BD = bipolar disorder; n/a = not available or not applicable; ns = nonsignificant; s = significant; Sz = schizophrenia