Skip to main content
PMC home page
Society for Endocrinology Open Access logoLink to Society for Endocrinology Open Access
. 2015 May 27;226(1):81–92. doi: 10.1530/JOE-15-0139

Diet-induced obesity causes peripheral and central ghrelin resistance by promoting inflammation

Farhana Naznin 1, Koji Toshinai 1,2, T M Zaved Waise 1, Cherl NamKoong 1, Abu Saleh Md Moin 1, Hideyuki Sakoda 1, Masamitsu Nakazato 1,3,✉
PMCID: PMC4485401  PMID: 26016745

Abstract

Ghrelin, a stomach-derived orexigenic peptide, transmits starvation signals to the hypothalamus via the vagus afferent nerve. Peripheral administration of ghrelin does not induce food intake in high fat diet (HFD)-induced obese mice. We investigated whether this ghrelin resistance was caused by dysfunction of the vagus afferent pathway. Administration (s.c.) of ghrelin did not induce food intake, suppression of oxygen consumption, electrical activity of the vagal afferent nerve, phosphorylation of ERK2 and AMP-activated protein kinase alpha in the nodose ganglion, or Fos expression in hypothalamic arcuate nucleus of mice fed a HFD for 12 weeks. Administration of anti-ghrelin IgG did not induce suppression of food intake in HFD-fed mice. Expression levels of ghrelin receptor mRNA in the nodose ganglion and hypothalamus of HFD-fed mice were reduced. Inflammatory responses, including upregulation of macrophage/microglia markers and inflammatory cytokines, occurred in the nodose ganglion and hypothalamus of HFD-fed mice. A HFD blunted ghrelin signaling in the nodose ganglion via a mechanism involving in situ activation of inflammation. These results indicate that ghrelin resistance in the obese state may be caused by dysregulation of ghrelin signaling via the vagal afferent.

Keywords: ghrelin, diet-induced obesity, nodose ganglion, vagus nerve, inflammation

Introduction

Control of food intake in the brain is regulated by the integration of both the neuronal and humoral signals from the periphery. A variety of sensory information derived from the gastrointestinal tract is transmitted to the nucleus of the tractus solitaries (NTS) in the medulla oblongata via the vagal afferent nerve, terminating in hypothalamic nuclei implicated in the control of feeding (Rinaman 2010). The nodose ganglion, located outside the jugular foramen, is a constellation of vagal afferent neurons that synthesize receptors for gut peptides that regulate feeding and energy homeostasis (Zhuo et al. 1997, Konturek et al. 2004). These receptors are transported to afferent terminals in the gastrointestinal mucosa, which are more optimally positioned to monitor bioactive substances released from gastrointestinal enteroendocrine cells. Nodose ganglion neurons are pseudounipolar neurons with two axons running towards the visceral organs and the NTS.

Ghrelin, a peptide primarily produced in the stomach, stimulates feeding (Kojima et al. 1999, Nakazato et al. 2001). Ghrelin exists in two major forms, n-octanoyl-modified ghrelin and des-acyl-ghrelin (a non-acylated form of ghrelin). The growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR), also known as the ghrelin receptor, is synthesized in vagal afferent neurons and transported to the stomach by axonal transport (Date et al. 2002). Ghrelin binds to this receptor and suppresses the electrical activity of the gastric vagal afferent. This information is transmitted to the NTS and relayed via the noradrenergic pathway to the hypothalamic neurons expressing orexigenic neuropeptides, neuropeptide Y (NPY) and agouti-related peptide (AgRP) (Date et al. 2006). Diet-induced obesity (DIO) causes resistance to central administration of ghrelin by suppressing expression of the ghrelin receptor in NPY/AgRP neurons (Briggs et al. 2010). Peripheral administration of ghrelin also failed to induce feeding in DIO mice (Briggs et al. 2010). However, the mechanism underlying this unresponsiveness remains to be demonstrated.

Immune-cell-mediated tissue inflammation in the adipose tissue, liver, and skeletal muscle plays a critical role in the development of obesity and insulin resistance (Hotamisligil et al. 1993, Schenk et al. 2008). Obesity-associated inflammation, including enhanced expression of interleukin 1 beta (IL1β), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), and IL6 in the hypothalamus, was first reported in 2005 (De Souza et al. 2005), and many investigators have since replicated this finding (Cai & Liu 2011, Thaler et al. 2013). DIO attenuated both sensitivities of vagal afferents to the satiety mediators and membrane excitability of vagal afferents (Daly et al. 2011), indicating that the development of obesity may be related to impairments in the vagal afferent system.

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether DIO-induced inflammatory responses in the nodose ganglion mediate ghrelin resistance in the vagal afferent system. We studied ghrelin's effects on feeding, energy consumption, electrical activation of the vagus afferent, and neuronal activation in the hypothalamus of DIO mice fed a high fat diet (HFD) for 12 weeks. Expression of the ghrelin receptor in both the nodose ganglion and hypothalamus were downregulated in HFD-fed mice. We also investigated inflammation in the nodose ganglion and hypothalamus by performing immunohistochemistry of macrophages/microglia and mRNA expression profiling of inflammatory cytokines.

Materials and methods

Animals

Male C57BL/6J mice (6-week-old, 20–21 g, Charles River Laboratories, Yokohama, Japan) were maintained in individual cages under controlled temperature (21–23 °C) and light (light on: 0800–2000 h) conditions. They were maintained on either chow diet (CD, 12.3% fat, 59.2% carbohydrate, 28.5% protein, and 14.2 kJ/g; CLEA Rodent Diet CE-2, CLEA Japan, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) or HFD (60% fat, 20% carbohydrate, 20% protein, and 21.9 kJ/g; no. D12492; Research Diets, New Brunswick, NJ, USA) with free access to food for 12 weeks. Cannulae were implanted i.c.v. into the lateral cerebral ventricle under anesthesia by i.p. injection of sodium pentobarbital (Abbot Laboratories). Only animals demonstrating progressive weight gain after the surgery were used in subsequent experiments. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of University of Miyazaki.

Characteristics of HFD-fed mice

Mice fed CD or HFD for 12 weeks (n=8/group) were fasted from 0900 to 1400 h, and then blood was collected by tail-prick. Blood glucose was measured with a glucometer (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan), and plasma insulin was measured using a mouse insulin EIA Kit (Morinaga Institute of Biological Science, Yokohama, Japan). For plasma ghrelin and leptin measurements, CD- or HFD-fed mice were deeply anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital, and blood samples were collected by cardiac puncture. Plasma ghrelin was measured using an active ghrelin ELISA Kit (Mitsubishi Chemical Medience, Tokyo, Japan; intra- and inter-assay precision coefficient of variation (CV) <10%, assay range 2.5–160 fmol/ml) and des-acyl ghrelin with a des-acyl ghrelin ELISA Kit (Mitsubishi Chemical Medience; intra- and inter-assay precision CV <10%, assay range 12.5–800 fmol/ml). Plasma leptin was measured using a mouse/rat leptin ELISA Kit (Morinaga Institute of Biological Science; intra- and inter-assay precision CV ≤10%, assay range 0.4–25.6 ng/ml). All samples were measured in duplicate. The amount of daily food intake was measured for 4 days before the administration experiments. Epididymal fat weight was measured at killing.

Food intake experiments

Mice fed CD or HFD (n=6/group) for 11 weeks were transferred to single cages and maintained for 1 week, during which they were acclimatized by s.c. injections of saline once daily for 3 days. In the first experiment, mice (n=6/group) received subcutaneously administered ghrelin (60 nmol/kg body weight (BW); Peptide Institute, Osaka, Japan) or saline. In the second experiment, mice (n=6/group) received an i.c.v. injection of artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) or ghrelin (500 pmol). Administration was performed at 1000 h in both experiments, and 2-h food intake was measured. In the third experiment, mice (n=6/group) received an i.c.v. injection of anti-ghrelin IgG (0.5 μg/2 μl aCSF) prepared elsewhere (Nakazato et al. 2001) or normal rabbit serum IgG (0.5 μg/2 μl aCSF) at 1800 h. In the fourth experiment, mice (n=6/group) received an i.p. injection of leptin (2 μg/g BW; Sigma–Aldrich) or saline at 2000 h. Dark-phase food intake was measured in the third and fourth experiments.

Oxygen consumption

Mice fed CD or HFD (n=4/group) for 11 weeks were housed in a metabolic chamber (Shinfactory, Fukuoka, Japan) for 1 week. They were given s.c. injection of ghrelin (60 nmol/kg BW) or saline at 1000 h, and then returned to the chambers. Oxygen consumption was measured in an Oxymax (Columbus Instruments, Columbus, OH, USA) for 120 min. Mice were deprived of food during the measurement.

Time-course of plasma ghrelin concentration after s.c. administration of ghrelin

Mice fed CD or HFD (n=3/group) were subcutaneously administered ghrelin (60 nmol/kg BW). Blood was taken from the tail vein 0, 15, 30, 60, and 120 min after administration and immediately collected into tubes containing disodium EDTA (1 g/l) with aprotinin (500 kIU/l) (Wako Pure Chemicals, Osaka, Japan). Plasma was mixed with 1 M HCl (10% of plasma volume). Ghrelin was measured using an active ghrelin ELISA Kit.

Electrophysiology study

Multiunit neural discharge in gastric vagal afferent fibers was recorded extracellularly. CD- or HFD-fed mice were anesthetized by an i.p. injection of urethan (1 g/kg; Sigma–Aldrich). For electrophysiological studies, animals were anesthetized throughout the procedure. Standard methods of extracellular recording from vagal nerve filaments were used, as developed in our laboratory (Date et al. 2005). In brief, we placed filaments isolated from the gastric branch of the vagal trunk peripheral, cut under the diaphragm for recording of afferent nerve activity, on a pair of silver wire electrodes. Silver wire electrodes, connected through a Differential Extracellular Amplifier (ER-1; Cygnus Technology, Delaware Water Gap, PA, USA) to a PowerLab/8SP (ADInstruments, Melbourne, FL, Australia), were used to record neural activity. The number of spikes was calculated using the Labchart 7 Software (ADInstruments) with a rate meter. After 10 min recording of basal nerve discharges from the multiunit afferents, these nerve discharges were continually recorded for 15 min after s.c. administration of saline or ghrelin (60 nmol/kg BW; n=4/group) in CD- or HFD-fed mice. The total number of spikes for 15 min after administration was calculated.

Fos expression

Mice (n=3/group) received an i.c.v. administration of ghrelin (500 pmol/2 μl aCSF), a s.c. administration of ghrelin (60 nmol/kg BW), or saline 90 min before transcardial perfusion with 4% paraformaldehyde. They were anesthetized with sodium pentobarbital and transcardially perfused with ice-cold heparinized 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB, pH 7.4) for 20 min, and then with ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde in PB for 20 min. The brain was removed and post-fixed overnight in the fixative solution containing 4% paraformaldehyde, and then cryoprotected in 0.1 M PB containing 20% sucrose. We cut 40-μm sections of the hypothalamus. Fos immunohistochemistry was performed using a method described elsewhere (Toshinai et al. 2003). Briefly, free-floating sections were incubated in 0.3% hydrogen peroxide for 10 min, blocked with 1% normal goat antiserum (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and incubated in rabbit Fos antiserum (1:500 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) in 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4) overnight at 4 °C with gentle agitation. Sections were then incubated in biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:500 dilution, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA), and immunoreactivity was visualized using the avidin–biotin–peroxidase complex reaction method with diaminobenzimide (VECTASTAIN Elite Kit, Vector Laboratories). Images were captured on an OLYMPUS AX-7 microscope (Olympus). Fos-positive cells were automatically counted in the sections using a cell-counting program (Bio-Imaging Analysis System Lumina Vision, Tokyo, Japan).

Real-time PCR

The nodose ganglion and hypothalamus (n=8–12/group) were removed from anesthetized CD- or HFD-fed mice. Total RNA was extracted with a RiboPure Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA). RT-PCR was conducted on a LightCycler System (Roche Diagnostics) using SYBR Premix Ex Taq (2×) (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) and the following primer sets: mouse Ghsr, 5'-ATCACCTCTGGGTCTTGTTGCTG-3' and 5'-GCTGAATGGCTCATTGTAGTCCTG-3'; ionized calcium binding adapter molecule (Iba1), 5'-AGCTGCCTGTCTTAACCTGCATC-3' and 5'-TTCTGGGACCGTTCTCACACTTC-3'; Egf-like module-containing, mucin-like, hormone receptor-like 1 (Emr1), 5'-GAGATTGTGGAAGCATCCGAGAC-3' and 5'-GACTGTACCCACATGGCTGATGA-3'; Il6, 5'-CCACTTCACAAGTCGGAGGCTTA-3' and 5'-CCAGTTTGGTAGCATCCATCATTTC-3'; Il1b, 5'-TCCAGGATGAGGACATGAGCAC-3' and 5'-GAACGTCACACACCAGCAGGTTA-3'; Tnf α, 5'-TATGGCCCAGACCCTCACA-3' and 5'-GGAGTAGACAAGGTACAACCCATC-3'; Toll-like receptor 4 (Tlr4), 5'-GGAAGTTCACATAGCTGAATGAC-3' and 5'-CAAGGCATGTCCAGAAATGAGA-3'; Tlr2, 5'-TGTCTCCACAAGCGGGACTTC-3' and 5'-TTGCACCACTCGCTCCGTA-3'; Tbp, 5'-CATTCTCAAACTCTGACCACTGCAC-3' and 5'-CAGCCAAGATTCACGGTAGATACAA-3'; and Gapdh, 5'-TCAAGAAGGTGGTGAAGCAG-3' and 5'-TGGGAGTTGCTGTTGAAGTC-3'. The obtained values were normalized against that for Gapdh or Tbp, used as an internal control.

Immunohistochemistry

Nodose ganglia and whole brains (n=4/group) were immersed in 4% paraformaldehyde/PB for 24 h at 4 °C, incubated for 24 h in PB containing 20% sucrose, quickly frozen on dry ice, and cut into 8-μm slices with a cryostat at −20 °C. Sections blocked for 5 min in protein-block serum-free solution (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) were incubated overnight at 4 °C with rabbit anti-IBA1 (1:10 000; Wako Pure Chemicals), rat anti-CD11b (1:50; AbD Serotec, Oxford, UK), and rat anti-CD86 (1:100; Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Immunofluorescence was performed with a combination of Alexa Fluor 488-labeled anti-rabbit secondary antibody or Alexa Fluor 594-labeled anti-rat secondary antibody (both 1:400; Invitrogen). Images were captured on an OLYMPUS AX-7 fluorescence microscope (Olympus). Cells immunostained with IBA1, CD11b, or CD86 antibody were counted manually with Olympus cellSens Imaging Software (Olympus). Quantitation was performed in a blinded fashion.

Western blotting

Mice (n=6/group) fed a CD or HFD for 12 weeks were anesthetized and received subcutaneous injections of ghrelin (60 nmol/kg BW) or saline. They were perfused with PB 60 min later for AMP-activated protein kinase alpha (AMPKα) measurement, or 120 min later for ERK1/2 measurement, then the nodose ganglion was isolated. Protein (10–20 μg) extracted from the nodose ganglion was separated on SDS–PAGE Tris–glycine gels (Mini-PROTEAN TGX Precast Gels, Bio-Rad) for 100 min at 75 V and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Membranes were blocked with 5% (w/v) non-fat dry milk and incubated with antibodies for phosphorylated Erk1/2 (Thr202/Thr204) (1:4000), Erk1/2 (1:4000), pAMPKα (1:2000), AMPKα (1:2000), or Gapdh (1:5000) (all five from Cell Signaling Technology Japan, Tokyo, Japan) in blocking buffer overnight at 4 °C. Membranes were then incubated with the corresponding secondary antibodies. For sequential analysis of membranes, bound antibodies were removed with stripping buffer (10% SDS, 1 M Tris–HCl, and pH 6.8) for 30 min at 55 °C. After washes, membranes were developed in ECL buffer (ImmunoStar LD, Wako Chemicals USA, Richmond, VA, USA) for 1 min. The chemiluminescent blots were visualized and imaged using a Syngene G: BOX iChemi XR System (Syngene, Cambridge, UK) and densitometry was performed on the lanes using the GeneTools Software (version 4.01; Syngene) to quantitate protein expression. Band intensities were normalized by calculating the respective ratios of the intensities of the bands of pERK to ERK or pAMPKα to AMPKα.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed by one- or two-way ANOVA followed by a Bonferroni's post-test for multiple comparisons, as appropriate. When two mean values were compared, analysis was performed by Mann–Whitney U test or Wilcoxon's or unpaired t-test. All data are expressed as means±s.e.m. P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Characterization of HFD-fed mice

Table 1 shows characteristics and blood parameters in mice fed a HFD for 12 weeks. Food intake amount in HFD-fed mice was significantly lower than in CD-fed mice, whereas energy intake of HFD-fed mice (57.4 kJ) was significantly higher than that of CD-fed mice (46.5 kJ). Body weights and epididymal fat weights in HFD-fed mice were higher than those in CD-fed mice. HFD caused significant increases in fasting blood glucose, plasma insulin and leptin, and decreases in plasma ghrelin and des-acyl ghrelin.

Table 1.

Characteristics and blood parameters of mice fed a CD or a HFD. Data are expressed as means±s.e.m. (n=6–8)

CD HFD
Initial body weight (g) 23.9±0.6 24.2±0.6
Final body weight (g) 30.2±0.4 49.6±0.9‡
Epididymal fat weight (g) 0.54±0.01 2.59±0.24‡
24-h food intake (g) 3.27±0.07 2.62±0.04‡
24-h energy intake (kJ) 46.5±1.0 57.4±0.8‡
Blood glucose (mmol/l) 6.5±0.3 9.8±0.7*
Plasma insulin (ng/ml) 0.35±0.01 1.65±0.09‡
Plasma leptin (ng/ml) 6.1±0.4 89.1±5.6‡
Plasma ghrelin (fmol/ml) 65.7±9.9 8.8±1.2†
Plasma des-acyl ghrelin (fmol/ml) 1255±157 937±54*
Open in a new tab

*P<0.05, † P<0.01, and ‡ P<0.001 versus CD.

Ghrelin and leptin responses

Both s.c. and i.c.v. administrations of ghrelin increased food intake in CD-fed mice, but not HFD-fed mice (Fig. 1A and B). Inversely, i.c.v. administration of anti-ghrelin IgG reduced dark-phase food intake in CD-fed mice, but not HFD-fed mice (Fig. 1C). S.c. administration of ghrelin reduced oxygen consumption in CD- but not HFD-fed mice (Fig. 1D, E and F). Leptin administration did not reduce food intake in HFD-fed mice (Fig. 1G).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Effects of ghrelin on food intake (A, B and C), and oxygen consumption (D, E and F) of mice fed a CD or a HFD for 12 weeks. Two-hour food intake during the light phase in response to s.c. (A) or i.c.v. (B) administration of ghrelin, and dark-phase food intake (C) in response to i.c.v. administration of NRS IgG or anti-ghrelin IgG, in CD- or HFD-fed mice. Oxygen consumptions in CD- (D) or HFD-fed mice (E) subjected to s.c. ghrelin administration, and area under the curve (AUC) of oxygen consumption from 0 to 2 h after ghrelin administration (F). Dark-phase food intake of CD- or HFD-fed mice subjected to leptin administration (G). NS, not significant. Values are means±s.e.m. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01.

Time-course of plasma ghrelin concentration

We compared time courses of plasma concentrations of ghrelin administered subcutaneously to CD- or HFD-fed mice (Fig. 2). The time courses of plasma ghrelin disappearance were similar between the two groups.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Time course of plasma ghrelin concentrations after s.c. administration to CD- or HFD-fed mice. Values are means±s.e.m.

No effect of ghrelin on vagal afferent activity in HFD-fed mice

A representative record of the vagal afferent electrical activity in response to saline or ghrelin administration is shown in Fig. 3. Ghrelin attenuated the vagal afferent nerve activity in CD- but not HFD-fed mice (Fig. 3A, B, C and D). Ghrelin-induced suppression of the number of spikes was abrogated in HFD-fed mice (Fig. 3E).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Electrophysiological effect of ghrelin on gastric vagal afferent activity in CD- or HFD-fed mice. Representative data for gastric vagal afferent discharge rates are shown in A, B, C and D. Gastric vagal afferent discharge in CD-fed mice was not affected by s.c. administration of saline (A), whereas it was inhibited by administration of ghrelin (B). Gastric vagal afferent discharge in HFD-fed mice was not affected by saline (C) or ghrelin (D). (E) Ghrelin significantly attenuated impulses 10 min after its injection in CD- but not HFD-fed mice. *P<0.05 versus CD-fed mice subjected to saline injection. NS, not significant.

Fos expression

Both s.c. and i.c.v. administrations of ghrelin caused a significant increase in the numbers of Fos-immunoreactive neurons in the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus of CD- but not HFD-fed mice (Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Representative Fos expression patterns in hypothalamic arcuate nucleus in response to s.c. administration of saline (vehicle) (A) or ghrelin (B) in CD-fed mice and saline (C) or ghrelin (D) in HFD-fed mice. Fos expression patterns in the arcuate nucleus in response to i.c.v. administration of artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF; vehicle) (E) or ghrelin (F) in CD-fed mice and aCSF (G) or ghrelin (H) in HFD-fed mice. Numbers of Fos-immunoreactive neurons of mice subjected to s.c. (I) or i.c.v. administration (J) of ghrelin or vehicle. Values are means±s.e.m. *P<0.05 versus saline or aCSF. Scale bars, 50 μm.

Ghsr mRNA expression

In HFD-fed mice, the Ghsr mRNA levels in the nodose ganglion and hypothalamus were significantly lower than those in CD-fed mice (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

mRNA expressions of Ghsr in the nodose ganglion and hypothalamus of CD- or HFD-fed mice. Values are means±s.e.m. *P<0.05 versus CD.

Inflammatory mRNA and immunohistochemistry

TLR4 expression was significantly higher in HFD-fed mice than in CD-fed mice in the nodose ganglion, but not in the hypothalamus (Fig. 6A). In both groups, we observed no significant difference in the expression of TLR2 in the nodose ganglion or hypothalamus (Fig. 6B). The Iba1, Il6, and Tnf α mRNAs were significantly upregulated in the nodose ganglion in HFD-fed mice relative to CD-fed mice (Fig. 6C). Hypothalamic expressions of mRNAs of Iba1, Il6, and Tnf α were also significantly upregulated in HFD-fed mice relative to CD-fed mice (Fig. 6D). The numbers of macrophages stained with anti-IBA1 (Fig. 6E and F) or anti-CD11b (Fig. 6G and H) antibodies in the nodose ganglion, as well as those stained with anti-IBA1 (Fig. 6I and J) or anti-CD11b (Fig. 6K and L) antibodies in the hypothalamus of HFD-fed mice, were significantly higher than those in CD-fed mice (Fig. 6M and N). Expression levels of the M1 macrophage markers IBA1 and CD86 in the nodose ganglion (Fig. 7A, B, D and E) and hypothalamus (Fig. 7G, H, J and K) of HFD-fed mice were significantly higher than those in CD-fed mice (Fig. 7M and N). Approximately 30% of IBA1-positive macrophages/microglia expressed CD86 immunoreactivity both in the nodose ganglion (Fig. 7C and F) and hypothalamus (Fig. 7I and L) of HFD-fed mice.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

mRNA expression of T lr4 (A) and Tlr2 (B) in the nodose ganglion and hypothalamus of CD- or HFD-fed mice. Expressions of genes encoding macrophage markers (Iba1 and Emr1) and inflammatory cytokines (Il1b, Il6, and Tnf α) in the nodose ganglion (C) and hypothalamus (D) of CD- or HFD-fed mice. mRNAs were quantitated relative to Gapdh or Tbp housekeeping genes, and relative levels are presented as fold change relative to CD. Values are means±s.e.m. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 versus CD. Histochemical analyses of HFD-induced macrophage accumulation in the nodose ganglion and hypothalamus. Immunohistochemical detection of IBA1 (E and F) and CD11b (G and H) in the nodose ganglion and IBA1 (I and J) and CD11b (K and L) in the hypothalamus of CD- or HFD-fed mice. Numbers of cells stained with IBA1 or CD11b antibody in the nodose ganglion (M) and hypothalamus (N). Values are means±s.e.m. *P<0.05 and **P<0.01 versus CD. Scale bars, 50 μm.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Immunohistochemical analyses of HFD-induced M1 macrophage accumulation in the nodose ganglion and hypothalamus. IBA1, CD86, and merged images of the nodose ganglion (A, B, C, D, E and F), and the hypothalamus (G, H, I, J, K and L) of CD- or HFD-fed mice. Arrows indicate co-localization of CD86 with IBA1. The insets in C, F, I and L are higher magnification examples of IBA1+/CD86+ cells. Numbers of cells stained with IBA1 or CD86 antibody in the nodose ganglion (M) and hypothalamus (N). Values are means±s.e.m. *P<0.05 versus CD. Scale bars, 50 μm.

Effects of ghrelin on phosphorylations of ERK1/2 and AMPKα

ERK1/2 and pERK1/2 were detected in the nodose ganglia of both CD- and HFD-fed mice (Fig. 8A). HFD did not affect the phosphorylation of either ERK1 or ERK2, normalized against the corresponding total ERK level (Fig. 8B). Ghrelin administration significantly increased pERK2 in CD- but not HFD-fed mice (Fig. 8C).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Representative western blots for pERK1/2 and ERK1/2 in the nodose ganglia of CD- and HFD-fed mice (A). Levels of basal phosphorylation of ERK1 and ERK2 in the nodose ganglion of CD- and HFD-fed mice (B). Phosphorylated ERK1 and ERK2 in the nodose ganglion after s.c. administration of ghrelin (C). GAPDH was used as a control. Values are means±s.e.m. and represent the ratio of the intensity of bands corresponding to pERK1 and ERK1 or pERK2 and ERK2. *P<0.05 vs saline.

The basal level of AMPKα in the nodose ganglion of HFD-fed mice was significantly higher than that in CD-fed mice (Fig. 9A and B). Ghrelin administration significantly increased pAMPKα in CD- but not HFD-fed mice (Fig. 9B).

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

Representative western blots for pAMPKα and AMPKα in the nodose ganglia of CD- or HFD-fed mice (A). Ghrelin promoted phosphorylation of AMPKα in CD- but not in HFD-fed mice (B). GAPDH was used as a control. Values are means±s.e.m. and represent the ratio of the intensity of bands corresponding to pAMPK and AMPK. *P<0.05 versus saline.

Discussion

In this study, we showed that peripheral ghrelin resistance is associated with inflammation in the nodose ganglia of HFD-fed mice, resulting in an impairment of the vagal afferent system. Results of previous studies indicated that both peripheral and central administration of ghrelin were unable to stimulate food intake in HFD-fed mice (Perreault et al. 2004, Briggs et al. 2010, Gardiner et al. 2010). Here, we confirmed these findings in mice given 12-week HFD, in which 60% of the energy was provided as fat. Moreover, s.c. administration of ghrelin did not evoke suppression of vagal afferent activity, phosphorylation of ERK2 and AMPKα in the nodose ganglion, or Fos expression in the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus. We also showed that neutralization of ghrelin by the i.c.v. administration of anti-ghrelin IgG failed to suppress natural feeding in DIO mice, indicating that endogenous ghrelin did not act as an orexigenic peptide under HFD. A HFD appeared to induce central ghrelin resistance by reducing both Ghsr expression in the hypothalamus and NPY/AgRP neuronal responsiveness to ghrelin (Briggs et al. 2010). Based on these findings, along with the upregulation of ghrelin secretion upon fasting and downregulation of its secretion after meals, ghrelin is considered not to promote obesity, but rather to prevent starvation (Andrews et al. 2010, McFarlane et al. 2014). In this study, the disappearance of plasma ghrelin after its administration to HFD-fed mice was similar to that in CD-fed mice, indicating that the pharmacokinetics of ghrelin in DIO mice may not account for ghrelin resistance. The vagal afferent nerve is the major pathway conveying ghrelin's signals for starvation to the brain (Date et al. 2002). We postulated that downregulation of Ghsr expression in the nodose ganglion of DIO mice could blunt transmission of gastric-derived ghrelin's signals.

Several lines of evidence indicated that HFD activates an inflammatory response in the systemic organs and hypothalamus of rodents and humans (De Souza et al. 2005, Milanski et al. 2009, Posey et al. 2009). Hypothalamic inflammation induced by a HFD-manifested neuronal injury triggers a reactive gliosis by microglia and astrocytes (Thaler et al. 2012). These cellular responses occur selectively in the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus, a target region of gastric-derived ghrelin's signals. We postulated that HFD also caused inflammatory changes in the nodose ganglion. The calcium-binding protein IBA1 is a marker of microglia/macrophage activation in the nervous system (Ito et al. 1998). CD11b is another marker of microglia/macrophage activation/recruitment (Perego et al. 2011). In this study, HFD induced macrophage activation and inflammatory responses in the nodose ganglion, as assessed by the increased numbers of IBA1- and CD11b-positive macrophages, and production of inflammatory cytokines such as Iba1, Il6, and Tnf α. CD86, an activating and costimulatory protein, is expressed in activated microglia (Henkel et al. 2006). We also found that abundant IBA1+ microglia expressed CD86, a marker of M1 macrophage/microglia. They were morphologically rounded and more ramified, indicating that more activated subtypes of macrophages/microglia were present. Several lines of evidence indicate that the vagal afferent nerve transmits gut-derived inflammatory signals to the brain (Goehler et al. 1999, Hosoi et al. 2005). In the present study, as we found Tlr4 expression was increased in the nodose ganglion of HFD-fed mice, further investigation is needed to determine whether HFD-induced TLR4 activation in the gut transmits inflammatory signals to the nodose ganglion via the vagal afferent.

The reported mechanisms by which ghrelin exerts its biological activities are complex. Ghrelin activates MAPKs, including ERK1/2 (Mousseaux et al. 2006). ERK1/2 are protein–serine/threonine kinases involved in the activation of nuclear transcription factors controlling proliferation, differentiation, and cell death (Gutkind 2000). In our hands, ghrelin administration to CD-fed mice, but not HFD-fed mice, induced ERK2 phosphorylation in the nodose ganglion. The reduced expression of the Ghsr in DIO mice could result in the downregulation of the GHSR-mediated ERK-signaling pathway in the vagal afferent system.

AMPK is a key regulatory enzyme in cellular energy balance. Changes in hypothalamic AMPK activity regulate food intake (Minokoshi et al. 2004), and ghrelin activates hypothalamic AMPK (Kola et al. 2005). In this study, administration of ghrelin to CD-fed mice induced AMPK phosphorylation in the nodose ganglion, but had no effect in DIO mice. Basal AMPK phosphorylation in the nodose ganglia of HFD-fed mice was significantly higher than that of CD-fed mice. The higher basal AMPK phosphorylation in skeletal muscle of DIO mice is thought to contribute to leptin resistance (Martin et al. 2006). The pathophysiological significance of altered AMPK phosphorylation level and AMPK's role as the ghrelin signaling molecule in the nodose ganglion should be investigated in future work.

Briggs et al. (2014) recently showed that 3-week HFD-induced hyperleptinemia (approximately 7 ng/ml) can cause ghrelin resistance. Furthermore, they observed hypothalamic gliosis, as revealed by increases in the numbers of glial fibrillary acidic protein-positive glia and their projections. They explained the ghrelin resistance under 3-week HFD as a consequence of leptin's counteracting effect against ghrelin on hypothalamic NPY/AgRP neurons. We detected marked hyperleptinemia (89 ng/ml) of HFD-fed mice in this study, in which leptin did not exert an effect as an anorectic protein, as reported in many investigations (El-Haschimi et al. 2000, Zhang et al. 2008). These mice exhibited leptin resistance, indicating that hyperleptinemia did not contribute to ghrelin resistance. We thought that long-term HFD causes ghrelin resistance via chronic inflammation in the nodose ganglion and hypothalamus.

Biosynthesis of ghrelin is downregulated in obesity, and fasting plasma ghrelin concentrations in humans are negatively correlated with body weight, percentage body fat, and fat mass (Tschöp et al. 2001, Shiiya et al. 2002). Notably, results of one study indicated that there was no difference in basal ghrelin levels between lean and obese individuals, and that ghrelin increased energy intake in mildly obese humans (Druce et al. 2005). We fed mice a HFD (60% calorie from fat) for 12 weeks and they become severely obese. Ghrelin did not stimulate feeding in these obese mice. In contrast, ghrelin increased food intake during the early stage (1–2 weeks) of HFD (23.5% calorie from fat) treatment in mildly obese mice (Briggs et al. 2014). There may be a possibility that the duration of fat exposure and the degree of obesity could affect ghrelin sensitivity in humans and animals.

Ghrelin modulates immune processes, in part, by suppressing sympathetic nerve activity and by reducing inflammatory cytokine production in activated macrophages (Dixit et al. 2004). The vagal efferent nerve activity was reduced in obese patients, and selective cholinergic activation of the vagal efferent nerve in DIO mice suppressed obesity-related inflammation and restored metabolic complications (Pavlov & Tracey 2012). Berkseth et al. (2014) recently showed that 4-week CD (12 kcal from fat) following 16-week HFD (60% kcal from fat) given to C57BL/6J mice reversed hypothalamic inflammation. A future study may delineate whether inflammation in the nodose ganglion and ghrelin resistance caused by HFD are also reversible after switching to a low-fat diet.

In conclusion, this study offers the new insights that HFD causes inflammatory responses in the nodose ganglion in addition to the hypothalamus. Additionally, ghrelin resistance in obese states could be associated with inflammation in the nodose ganglion. The vagal afferent nerve may act as a novel pathway that regulates the peripheral inflammatory signal to the brain.

Author contribution statement

F N, K T, H S, and M N designed the experiments; F N, K T, T M Z W, C N, and A S M M performed the experiments; F N, K T, and C N analyzed the data. All authors prepared and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Sumie Tajiri (University of Miyazaki) for technical support.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.

Funding

This work was supported in part by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (no. 25293216) and Agency for Medical Research and Development–Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (AMED–CREST), AMED to M N.

References

  1. Andrews ZB, Erion DM, Beiler R, Choi CS, Shulman GI, Horvath TL. Uncoupling protein-2 decreases the lipogenic actions of ghrelin. Endocrinology. 2010;151:2078–2086. doi: 10.1210/en.2009-0850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Berkseth KE, Guyenet SJ, Melhorn SJ, Lee D, Thaler JP, Schur EA, Schwartz MW. Hypothalamic gliosis associated with high-fat diet feeding is reversible in mice: a combined immunohistochemical and magnetic resonance imaging study. Endocrinology. 2014;155:2858–2867. doi: 10.1210/en.2014-1121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Briggs DI, Enriori PJ, Lemus MB, Cowley MA, Andrews ZB. Diet-induced obesity causes ghrelin resistance in arcuate NPY/AgRP neurons. Endocrinology. 2010;151:4745–4755. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-0556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Briggs DI, Lockie SH, Benzler J, Wu Q, Stark R, Reichenbach A, Hoy AJ, Lemus MB, Coleman HA, Parkington HC, et al. Evidence that diet-induced hyperleptinemia, but not hypothalamic gliosis, causes ghrelin resistance in NPY/AgRP neurons of male mice. Endocrinology. 2014;155:2411–2422. doi: 10.1210/en.2013-1861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cai D, Liu T. Hypothalamic inflammation: a double-edged sword to nutritional diseases. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2011;1243:E1–E39. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06388.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Daly DM, Park SJ, Valinsky WC, Beyak MJ. Impaired intestinal afferent nerve satiety signalling and vagal afferent excitability in diet induced obesity in the mouse. Journal of Physiology. 2011;589:2857–2870. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.204594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Date Y, Murakami N, Toshinai K, Matsukura S, Niijima A, Matsuo H, Kangawa K, Nakazato M. The role of the gastric afferent vagal nerve in ghrelin-induced feeding and growth hormone secretion in rats. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:1120–1128. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.35954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Date Y, Toshinai K, Koda S, Miyazato M, Shimbara T, Tsuruta T, Niijima A, Kangawa K, Nakazato M. Peripheral interaction of ghrelin with cholecystokinin on feeding regulation. Endocrinology. 2005;146:3518–3525. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-1240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Date Y, Shimbara T, Koda S, Toshinai K, Ida T, Murakami N, Miyazato M, Kokame K, Ishizuka Y, Ishida Y, et al. Peripheral ghrelin transmits orexigenic signals through the noradrenergic pathway from the hindbrain to the hypothalamus. Cell Metabolism. 2006;4:323–331. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. De Souza CT, Araujo EP, Bordin S, Ashimine R, Zollner RL, Boschero AC, Saad MJ, Velloso LA. Consumption of a fat-rich diet activates a proinflammatory response and induces insulin resistance in the hypothalamus. Endocrinology. 2005;146:4192–4199. doi: 10.1210/en.2004-1520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dixit VD, Schaffer EM, Pyle RS, Collins GD, Sakthivel SK, Palaniappan R, Lillard JW, Jr, Taub DD. Ghrelin inhibits leptin- and activation-induced proinflammatory cytokine expression by human monocytes and T cells. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2004;114:57–66. doi: 10.1172/JCI200421134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Druce MR, Wren AM, Park AJ, Milton JE, Patterson M, Frost G, Ghatei MA, Small C, Bloom SR. Ghrelin increases food intake in obese as well as lean subjects. International Journal of Obesity. 2005;29:1130–1136. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. El-Haschimi K, Pierroz DD, Hileman SM, Bjorbaek C, Flier JS. Two defects contribute to hypothalamic leptin resistance in mice with diet-induced obesity. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2000;105:1827–1832. doi: 10.1172/JCI9842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gardiner JV, Campbell D, Patterson M, Kent A, Ghatei MA, Bloom SR, Bewick GA. The hyperphagic effect of ghrelin is inhibited in mice by a diet high in fat. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:2468–2476. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Goehler LE, Gaykema RP, Nguyen KT, Lee JE, Tilders FJ, Maier SF, Watkins LR. Interleukin-1β in immune cells of the abdominal vagus nerve: a link between the immune and nervous systems? Journal of Neuroscience. 1999;19:2799–2806. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-07-02799.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gutkind JS. Regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling networks by G protein-coupled receptors. Science's STKE: Signal Transduction Knowledge Environment. 2000;2000:re1. doi: 10.1126/stke.2000.40.re1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Henkel JS, Beers DR, Siklós L, Appel SH. The chemokine MCP-1 and the dendritic and myeloid cells it attracts are increased in the mSOD1 mouse model of ALS. Molecular and Cellular Neurosciences. 2006;31:427–437. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2005.10.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hosoi T, Okuma Y, Matsuda T, Nomura Y. Novel pathway for LPS-induced afferent vagus nerve activation: possible role of nodose ganglion. Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic & Clinical. 2005;120:104–107. doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2004.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hotamisligil GS, Shargill NS, Spiegelman BM. Adipose expression of tumor necrosis factor-α: direct role in obesity-linked insulin resistance. Science. 1993;259:87–91. doi: 10.1126/science.7678183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ito D, Imai Y, Ohsawa K, Nakajima K, Fukuuchi Y, Kohsaka S. Microglia-specific localisation of a novel calcium binding protein, Iba1. Molecular Brain Research. 1998;57:1–9. doi: 10.1016/S0169-328X(98)00040-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kojima M, Hosoda H, Date Y, Nakazato M, Matsuo H, Kangawa K. Ghrelin is a growth-hormone-releasing acylated peptide from stomach. Nature. 1999;402:656–660. doi: 10.1038/45230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kola B, Hubina E, Tucci SA, Kirkham TC, Garcia EA, Mitchell SE, Williams LM, Hawley SA, Hardie DG, Grossman AB, et al. Cannabinoids and ghrelin have both central and peripheral metabolic and cardiac effects via AMP-activated protein kinase. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2005;280:25196–25201. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C500175200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Konturek SJ, Konturek JW, Pawlik T, Brzozowski T. Brain–gut axis and its role in the control of food intake. Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 2004;55:137–154. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Martin TL, Alquier T, Asakura K, Furukawa N, Preitner F, Kahn BB. Diet-induced obesity alters AMP kinase activity in hypothalamus and skeletal muscle. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2006;281:18933–18941. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M512831200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. McFarlane MR, Brown MS, Goldstein JL, Zhao TJ. Induced ablation of ghrelin cells in adult mice does not decrease food intake, body weight, or response to high-fat diet. Cell Metabolism. 2014;20:54–60. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Milanski M, Degasperi G, Coope A, Morari J, Denis R, Cintra DE, Tsukumo DM, Anhe G, Amaral ME, Takahashi HK, et al. Saturated fatty acids produce an inflammatory response predominantly through the activation of TLR4 signaling in hypothalamus: implications for the pathogenesis of obesity. Journal of Neuroscience. 2009;29:359–370. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2760-08.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Minokoshi Y, Alquier T, Furukawa N, Kim Y-B, Lee A, Xue B, Mu J, Foufelle F, Ferre P, Birnbaum MJ, et al. AMP-kinase regulates food intake by responding to hormonal and nutrient signals in the hypothalamus. Nature. 2004;428:569–574. doi: 10.1038/nature02440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Mousseaux D, Le Gallic L, Ryan J, Oiry C, Gagne D, Fehrentz JA, Galleyrand JC, Martinez J. Regulation of ERK1/2 activity by ghrelin-activated growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1A involves a PLC/PKCϵ pathway. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2006;148:350–365. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Nakazato M, Murakami N, Date Y, Kojima M, Matsuo H, Kangawa K, Matsukura S. A role for ghrelin in the central regulation of feeding. Nature. 2001;409:194–198. doi: 10.1038/35051587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Pavlov VA, Tracey KJ. The vagus nerve and the inflammatory reflex – linking immunity and metabolism. Nature Reviews. Endocrinology. 2012;8:743–754. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2012.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Perego C, Fumagalli S, De Simoni MG. Temporal pattern of expression and colocalization of microglia/macrophage phenotype markers following brain ischemic injury in mice. Journal of Neuroinflammation. 2011;8:174. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-8-174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Perreault M, Istrate N, Wang L, Nichols AJ, Tozzo E, Stricker-Krongrad A. Resistance to the orexigenic effect of ghrelin in dietary-induced obesity in mice: reversal upon weight loss. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders. 2004;28:879–885. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Posey KA, Clegg DJ, Printz RL, Byun J, Morton GJ, Vivekanandan-Giri A, Pennathur S, Baskin DG, Heinecke JW, Woods SC, et al. Hypothalamic proinflammatory lipid accumulation, inflammation, and insulin resistance in rats fed a high-fat diet. American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2009;296:E1003–E1012. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90377.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Rinaman L. Ascending projections from the caudal visceral nucleus of the solitary tract to brain regions involved in food intake and energy expenditure. Brain Research. 2010;1350:18–34. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.03.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Schenk S, Saberi M, Olefsky JM. Insulin sensitivity: modulation by nutrients and inflammation. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2008;118:2992–3002. doi: 10.1172/JCI34260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Shiiya T, Nakazato M, Mizuta M, Date Y, Mondal MS, Tanaka M, Nozoe S, Hosoda H, Kangawa K, Matsukura S. Plasma ghrelin levels in lean and obese humans and the effect of glucose on ghrelin secretion. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2002;87:240–244. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.1.8129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Thaler JP, Yi CX, Schur EA, Guyenet SJ, Hwang BH, Dietrich MO, Zhao X, Sarruf DA, Izgur V, Maravilla KR, et al. Obesity is associated with hypothalamic injury in rodents and humans. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2012;122:153–162. doi: 10.1172/JCI59660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Thaler JP, Guyenet SJ, Dorfman MD, Wisse BE, Schwartz MW. Hypothalamic inflammation: marker or mechanism of obesity pathogenesis? Diabetes. 2013;62:2629–2634. doi: 10.2337/db12-1605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Toshinai K, Date Y, Murakami N, Shimada M, Mondal MS, Shimbara T, Guan JL, Wang QP, Funahashi H, Sakurai T, et al. Ghrelin-induced food intake is mediated via the orexin pathway. Endocrinology. 2003;144:1506–1512. doi: 10.1210/en.2002-220788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Tschöp M, Weyer C, Tataranni PA, Devanarayan V, Ravussin E, Heiman ML. Circulating ghrelin levels are decreased in human obesity. Diabetes. 2001;50:707–709. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.50.4.707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang X, Zhang G, Zhang H, Karin M, Bai H, Cai D. Hypothalamic IKKβ/NF-κB and ER stress link overnutrition to energy imbalance and obesity. Cell. 2008;135:61–73. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhuo H, Ichikawa H, Helke CJ. Neurochemistry of the nodose ganglion. Progress in Neurobiology. 1997;52:79–107. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0082(97)00003-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Endocrinology are provided here courtesy of Bioscientifica Ltd.

RESOURCES