Table 2.
Bivariate Logistic Regression Analyses of Unprotected Sex at Last Sexual Intercourse Among HIV-Positive and HIV-Negative Individuals in Uganda, 2011
| HIV-Negative (N=14,350) |
HIV- Positive (N=1,118) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | β (SE) | OR (95% CI) | β (SE) | AOR (95% CI) |
| Intoxication at last sexual intercourse | ||||
| Yes | 0.78 (0.08) | 2.18 (1.86–2.55) | 0.30 (0.16) | 1.35 (1.01–1.76) |
| No (Ref.) | ||||
| Sex | ||||
| Male | −0.53 (0.05) | 0.60 (0.53–0.66) | −0.26 (0.14) | 0.77 (0.58–1.02) |
| Female (Ref.) | ||||
| Age (mean,, in years) | 0.09 (0.03) | 1.10 (1.09–1.11) | −0.01 (0.01) | 0.99 (0.97–1.01) |
| Marital status | ||||
| Unmarried | −2.56 (0.06) | 0.08 (0.07–0.09) | −1.16 (0.15) | 0.31 (0.23–0.42) |
| Married/cohabitating (Ref.) | ||||
| Education | ||||
| Primary/no education | 1.24 (0.05) | 3.44 (3.10–3.84) | 0.40 (0.15) | 1.50 (1.10 2.04) |
| Secondary or higher (Ref.) | ||||
| Residence | ||||
| Rural | 1.06 (0.06) | 2.90 (2.58–3.25) | 0.41 (0.15) | 1.51 (1.11 2.05) |
| Urban (Ref.) | ||||
| Wealth index | ||||
| Middle vs. rich/richest (Ref.) | 0.91 (0.08) | 2.48 (2.11–2.91) | 0.51 (0.20) | 1.67 (1.11–2.49) |
| Poor/poorest vs. rich/richest(Ref.) | 1.12 (0.07) | 3.08 (2.69–3.51) | 0.73 (0.17) | 2.08 (1.48 2.93) |
| Age at First Sexual Intercourse | ||||
| < 15 years | 0.02 (0.01) | 1.02 (0.87–1.19) | 0.12 (0.09) | 1.13 (0.78–1.65) |
| 15 years | ||||
| Knows condoms prevent HIV | ||||
| No | 0.90 (0.09) | 2.47 (2.04–2.98) | 0.55 (0.24) | 1.74 (1.08 2.79) |
| Yes (Ref.) | ||||
| Sex with non-spousal, non-cohabitating partner(s) (prior year) | ||||
| Yes | −2.53 (0.06) | 0.08 (0.07–0.09) | −1.17 (0.14) | 0.31 (0.23 0.41) |
| No (Ref.) | ||||
| Relationship to last sexual partner | ||||
| Casual | −1.64 (0.12) | 0.20 (0.15–0.25) | −1.43 (0.30) | 0.24 (0.13 0.44) |
| Steady (Ref.) | ||||
Note:
Bolded odds ratios (ORs) significant at p < 0.001;
β = beta coefficient; SE= standard errors; 95% CI = confidence interval; Ref. = reference group.