Table 3. Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Reported in Studies Included in Meta-Analysis.
Author (Year) | Procedure | Pre-operative BCVA (logMAR)(Mean) | Pre-operative BCVA (logMAR)(SD) | Post-operative BCVA (logMAR)(Mean) | Post-operative BCVA (logMAR)(SD) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Busbee (2002[19], 2003[20]) | ISBCS | 0.618 | 0 | 0.1303 | 0 |
DSBCS | 0.618 | 0 | 0.1303 | 0 | |
Castells (2006)[21] | ISBCS | 0.54 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.1 |
DSBCS | 0.56 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.17 | |
Chung (2009)[17] | ISBCS | 0.31 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.12 |
DSBCS | 0.29 | 0.16 | 0.1 | 0.11 | |
Gothwal (2011)[18] | ISBCS | 0.42 | 0.26 | 0.2 | 0.23 |
DSBCS | 0.4 | 0.35 | 0.19 | 0.27 | |
Hiratsuka (2011)[22] | ISBCS | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.03 | 0.25 |
DSBCS | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.03 | 0.25 | |
Leivo (2011)[23] | ISBCS | 0.477 | 0.176 | 0.0969 | 0.175 |
DSBCS | 0.477 | 0.176 | 0.176 | 0.175 | |
Lundstrom (2006)[7] | ISBCS | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 1.6 |
DSBCS | 0.2 | 0 | 0.1 | 1.6 | |
Lundstrom (2009)[8] | ISBCS | 0.2 | 1.7 | 0 | 1.52 |
DSBCS | 0.2 | 1.7 | 0 | 1.52 | |
Sarikkola (2011)[25] | ISBCS | 0.477 | 0.175 | 0.1 | 0.195 |
DSBCS | 0.477 | 0.175 | 0.2 | 0.195 | |
Serrano-Aguilar (2012)[24] | ISBCS | 0.699 | 0.2 | 0.0414 | 0.2 |
DSBCS | 0.699 | 0.176 | 0.0414 | 0.2 |
BCVA = best corrected visual acuity, logMAR = Logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution