Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 May 2;66(1):106–113. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.02.339

Table 3.

Follow-up Time, Number of Events, Incidence Rates, and Hazards Ratios; Incident Patients in Hemodialysis Centers Using Darbepoetin Alfa vs. Epoetin Alfa

Outcomes Sample
Size
F/U Time
(person-y)
No. of
Events
Incidence Rate
(per 1000 person-
y)
Unadjusted Model 1 Model 2
Mortality 19932 21917.67 5550 253.22 1.12 (1.06, 1.20) 1.06 (1.00, 1.13) 1.05 (0.99, 1.12)
Cardiovascular Mortality 19932 21917.67 2037 92.94 1.11 (1.00, 1.24) 1.05 (0.94, 1.16) 1.05 (0.94, 1.16)
Stroke 9455 10456.87 248 23.72 0.98 (0.72, 1.34) 1.04 (0.76, 1.43) 1.02 (0.75, 1.41)
Myocardial infarction 9455 10363.29 372 35.90 1.17 (0.91, 1.50) 1.17 (0.91, 1.50) 1.16 (0.90, 1.50)
Composite^ 9455 10190.52 1424 139.74 1.10 (0.97, 1.25) 1.09 (0.96, 1.24) 1.10 (0.96, 1.25)

Note: Unless otherwise indicated, values are given as hazard ratio (95% confidence interval). Time-to-event analyses started on the day of reported incidence of end-stage renal disease for mortality outcomes and on day 91 after end-stage renal disease for non-fatal and composite outcomes. Model 1 adjusted for age, sex, race, Hispanic ethnicity, Medicaid eligibility, and incidence year. Model 2 additionally adjusted for all comorbidities, body mass index, serum albumin concentration, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Multiple imputation was used to address missing data. Results from complete case analyses were not materially different (see Table S2).

^

Composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular mortality