Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 16;2015:362542. doi: 10.1155/2015/362542

Table 3.

Interaction analysis between the variations of NFκB1 and IκBα on NPC risk.

Cases (n = 1590) 
IκBα: rs696 G>A
Controls (n = 1979) 
IκBα: rs696 G>A
Crude OR 
(95% CI)a
Adjusted OR 
(95% CI)a
P inter b
GG + AG
n (%)
AA
n (%)
GG + AG
n (%)
AA
n (%)
AA versus GG + AG AA versus GG + AG
NFκB1:
 rs28362491 del/ins
  del/del 204 (75.8) 65 (24.2) 331 (79.0) 88 (21.0) 1.20 (0.83–1.73) 1.24 (0.85–1.80)
  del/ins 575 (74.8) 194 (25.2) 762 (80.2) 188 (19.8) 1.37 (1.09–1.72) 1.38  (1.09–1.74)
  ins/ins 392 (71.0) 160 (29.0) 482 (79.0) 124 (21.0) 1.54 (1.18–2.01) 1.53  (1.17–2.02)
 Combined genotypes 2.25 × 10−6
  del/ins + ins/ins 967 (73.2) 354 (26.8) 1244 (79.7) 316 (20.3) 1.44 (1.21–1.71) 1.45  (1.22–1.74)

aORs were adjusted for age, sex and smoking status, and alcohol use, family history of cancer in a logistic regression model.

b P value of test for the multiplicative interaction between rs696 G>A genotypes and rs28362491 del/ins genotypes on cancer risk in logistic regression models.