. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Fam Issues. 2013 Sep 12;36(10):1296–1323. doi: 10.1177/0192513X13501664

Table 3.

OLS Regression Predicting Latino Adolescents’ Future Obligation to Support the Family (N=552)

	Model 1		Model 2		Model 3		Model 4

	B	SE B	B	SE B	B	SE B	B	SE B
Location (base=Los Angeles)
North Carolina-rural	0.25 ^*	0.12	0.03	0.11	0.08	0.11	−0.02	0.09
North Carolina-urban	0.27 ^***	0.08	0.11	0.07	0.16	0.10	0.07	0.08
Demographic characteristics
Female			0.05	0.06	0.04	0.06	0.01	0.07
Age			−0.06	0.04	−0.06	0.04	−0.07	0.05
Foreign born			0.12	0.10	0.13	0.09	0.13	0.09
Non-English at home			0.17 ^**	0.07	0.15 ^*	0.07	0.04	0.08
Living with both biological parents			−0.07	0.09	−0.06	0.08	−0.06	0.08
Number of siblings in household			0.02	0.03	0.02	0.03	0.03	0.03
Neither parent graduated HS			0.32 ^***	0.08	0.33 ^***	0.07	0.33 ^***	0.07
Social contact¹
% Hispanic in school tract					0.19	0.23	0.47 ^**	0.20
Ethnic discrimination					−0.58	0.48	−0.55	0.47
Ethnic identity¹							0.17 ^***	0.03
Constant	3.49 ^***	0.04	4.13 ^***	0.61	4.10 ^***	0.62	4.38 ^***	0.70
R²	0.024		0.082		0.087		0.166
N	552		552		552		552

Social contact measures and ethnic identity are centered at the mean

p<.10,

^**

p<.05,

^***

p<.01

Notes: B and S.E. estimates calculated using Stata’s -mim- command based on Rubin’s combination rules (1987). R² is calculated following Harel (2009).