Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 30;8:281. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1243-4

Table 3.

Factors associated with wound dehiscence as shown by univariate and multivariate analyses results (N = 24)

Independent variables Wound dehiscence Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Yes (N/%) No (N/%) OR (95% CI) p value OR (95% CI) p value
Type of closure
 Massive closure 14 (6.9) 190 (93.1)
 Layered closure 10 (33.3) 20 (66.7) 3.8 (2.2–7.4) 0.002 5.1 (3.2–8.4) 0.011
Fascia suture technique
 Continuous 9 (5.4) 157 (94.6)
 Interrupted 15 (22.1) 53 (77.9) 6.1 (2.9–9.4) 0.001 3.2 (1.7–6.0) 0.003
Suture absorption
 Non-absorbable 19 (9.3) 185 (90.7)
 Absorbable 5 (7.6) 63 (92.6) 1.7 (0.4–2.1) 0.128
Suture material
 Monofilament 10 (10.6) 84 (89.4)
 Multifilament 14 (12.7) 96 (87.3) 2.8 (0.4–3.9) 0.481
Suture type
 Prolene/nylon 11 (11.7) 83 (88.3)
 Vicryl 13 (11.8) 97 (88.2) 1.9 (0.8–2.9) 0.945