Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 30;52(7):3947–3964. doi: 10.1007/s13197-014-1588-z

Table 1.

Comparison of meat quality control technologies

Sensor/Indicator Advantages Dis-advantages
Time temperature indicator Easy to be integrated into packaging No information about quality of
system, can be checked by naked eye, food, must be conditioned before use.
cheap and economical, can be measured no contact with food
by electronic devices
Gas indicator Can be integrated into the packaging No information about gas concentration
films, can be checked by naked eye, attached inside the package
cheap and economical, and its chemical dye may
can be measured by electronic devices. interfere in food quality.
Freshness indicator Sensitive, can be checked by naked eye, False negatives results, attached
cheap and economical, can be inside the package which may
measured by electronic devices. interfere in food quality.
Biosensors Can be integrated into the packaging films, Can not detect low concentrated contamination,
can be checked by naked eye, may have chemical effect on the food.
cheap and economical, can be measured by
electronic devices, pathogen
and microbial detection.
Gas sensors Sensitive, Can be integrated into the Nil
packaging films, high spatial resolution,
can be checked by naked eye and optical devices,
not affected by heat, electromagnetic and stirring.
E-nose Accurate since uses an array of Expensive for packaging and
sensors, can detect many kind of commercial purpose.
volatile compounds, can be integrated
into pattern recognition and
decision making systems.
Fluorescence-base (oxygen) Sensitive, concentration of oxygen can not be checked by naked eye.
can be checked by optical device, can
be used in headspace or in liquid, fast
and reliable.
RFID tags Accurate, Can be integrated into barcodes, The signal can be lost, expensive to
wireless technology, reading multiple be commercialized.
products at once, fast.