Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 1;5:11650. doi: 10.1038/srep11650

Figure 6. The effects of miR-100 silencing on breast cancer chemotherapy.

Figure 6

(A) Relative cell viability of breast cancer cells after AMO treatments. SK-BR-3 cells were treated with AMO-miR-100 or AMO-miR-100-scrambled at different concentrations. Forty-eight h later, the cell viability was detected. (B) Effects of miR-100 silencing on breast cancer chemotherapy. SK-BR-3 cells were simultaneously treated with AMO and Cisplatin at different concentrations. Subsequently, the cell viability was evaluated. (C) Caspase 3/7 activity analysis from breast cancer cells. SK-BR-3 cells were treated with AMO and Cisplatin. Forty-eight h later the caspase 3/7 activity of cells was analysed. The statistically significant differences between different treatments were indicated with asterisks (*p < 0.05).