Skip to main content
. 2014 May 15;16(11):994–1001. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12272

Table 2.

Uni- and multivariate analysis of factors influencing colorectal liver metastases (CLM) detection at intra-operative ultrasound (IOUS) and contrast-enhanced (CE)-IOUS

No Nr (%) Yes Nr (%) χ2 (P-value) Logistic regression (P-value) OR 95% CI
New CLM at IOUS
 MRI versus CT
  MRI 47 (63) 28 (37) .436 NS
  CT 29 (56) 23 (44)
 PET
  No 26 (74) 9 (26) .061 NS
  Yes 50 (54) 42 (46)
 Multiple CLM (≥3) (pre-operative imaging)
  No 47 (72) 18 (28) .010 .016 2.5 1.18–5.28
  Yes 29 (47) 33 (53)
 Pre-operative CHTa
  No 23 (77) 7 (23) .026 .044 2.66 1.02–6.94
  Yes 51 (54) 44 (46)
 Bright liver
  No 59 (57) 45 (43) .128 NS
  Yes 17 (74) 6 (26)
 Isoechoic CLMb
  No 37 (65) 20 (35) .421 NS
  Yes 34 (58) 25 (42)
 Hyperechoic CLMb
  No 58 (61) 37 (39) .942 NS
  Yes 13 (62) 8 (38)
 Hypoechoic CLMb
  No 47 (59) 33 (41) .418 NS
  Yes 24 (67) 12 (33)
New CLM at CE-IOUS
 MRI versus CT
  MRI 71 (95) 4 (5) .698 NS
  CT 50 (96) 2 (4)
 PET
  No 33 (94) 2 (6) .746 NS
  Yes 88 (96) 4 (4)
 Multiple CLM (≥3) (IOUS)
  No 51 (100) 0 (0) .023 .014 1.92 1.13–6.43
  Yes 70 (92) 6 (8)
 Pre-operative CHTa
  No 30 (100) 0 (0) .200 NS
  Yes 90 (95) 5 (5)
 Bright liver
  No 99 (95) 5 (5) .925 NS
  Yes 22 (96) 1 (4)
 Isoechoic CLMb
  No 56 (98) 1 (2) .041 .049 2.84 1.72–8.96
  Yes 54 (91) 5 (9)
 Hyperechoic CLMb
  No 89 (94) 6 (6) .237 NS
  Yes 21 (100) 0 (0)
 Hypoechoic CLMb
  No 75 (94) 5 (6) .435 NS
  Yes 35 (97) 1 (3)

MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; CT, computed tomography; PET; positron emission tomography; CHT, chemotherapy; OR, odds-ration; CI, confidence interval.

a

Data are not available in two patients.

b

Data are not available in 11 patients.