Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 25;12(1):79–89. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.06.001

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Interaction between IP3R3 and EB3 Is Required for Effective IP3R3 Clustering

(A) Time-lapse images (times, in s, shown in panels) of GFP fluorescence in HLMVECs expressing GFP-IP3R3(WT) or GFP-IP3R3(T804A) after stimulation with α-thrombin (50 nM, at t = 0). Scale bar, 10 μm.

(B and C) Summary results (mean ± SEM from five to seven cells) show the number of clusters for GFP-IP3R3 and GFP-IP3R3(T804A) (B) and cluster lifetime (C) after stimulation with α-thrombin (50 nM at t = 0). Data were analyzed using processed images as in Figures 3D and 3E. ∗∗Using Student’s t test.

(D) Model for EB3-dependent IP3R3 clustering and amplification of Ca2+ signals. EB3 facilitates clustering of IP3Rs within ER membranes (left). α-Thrombin, via PAR-1, activates PLC and synthesis of IP3. We propose that IP3Rs more effectively release Ca2+ in response to this IP3 when they have clustered, possibly because amplification of the signals by Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release is more effective.