Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 5;8(3):147–153. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2015.03.004

Table 1.

Results of the Analysis of Tumor Volume and Tumor Metabolism in LAPC4-CR Xenograft Models Using [18F]-FDG-PET/CT

Mouse ID
Tumor Growth
Caliper Volume Estimate
CT Tumor Volume
FDG Metabolic Volume
FDG Metabolism Max
FDG Metabolism Mean70%
TBR Mean70%/Liver
TMR Mean70%/Muscle
Intratumor Heterogeneity
(d) (mm3) (mm3) (mm3) (ID/cm3wt) (ID/cm3wt) (ID/cm3wt)/liver (ID/cm3wt)/muscle Range (ID/cm3wt) IQR (ID/cm3wt) IQR (%)
03A00 35 133.1 206.0 19.4 4.39 3.50 10.3 19.5 4.2 1.9 121%
03A01 35 111.6 160.2 30.9 1.84 1.49 4.7 4.0 1.5 0.5 42%
03B00 43 156.8 228.2 5.0 2.73 2.18 7.5 4.4 1.9 0.6 50%
03B01 43 185.7 247.1 12.8 1.93 1.51 3.6 3.6 1.3 0.5 58%
03C00 43 116.6 167.7 6.2 2.95 2.38 6.6 10.8 2.6 1.0 119%
03C01 43 113.1 222.7 23.4 1.82 1.42 5.1 5.5 1.4 0.5 52%
03C03 43 152.6 122.0 4.3 1.75 1.37 4.6 8.1 1.3 0.5 83%
04F01 49 158.1 81.3 6.8 3.68 2.97 8.5 7.2 3.2 1.7 179%
04F03 49 210.7 253.2 37.5 2.37 1.90 6.3 3.0 2.0 0.8 59%
04A00 84 93.8 100.8 2.3 1.59 1.29 4.2 5.0 1.4 0.4 65%
04C00 84 161.4 278.7 27.1 3.82 2.99 10.7 9.0 3.3 1.0 51%
04E03 84 168.8 148.2 11.0 2.16 1.73 6.7 3.3 1.4 0.7 72%
04F00 98 NA 227.5 27.8 3.96 3.05 8.5 12.7 3.2 1.2 59%
Mean ± standard deviation 146.9 ± 34.2 188.0 ± 62.4 16.5 ± 11.8 2.7 ± 1.0 2.1 ± 0.8 6.7 ± 2.3 7.4 ± 4.7 2.2 ± 1.0 0.9 ± 0.5 78% ± 39%
Median 154.7 206.0 12.8 2.4 1.9 6.6 5.5 1.9 0.7 59%
95% CI of median [113.1, 168.8] [122.0, 247.1] [5.0, 27.8] [1.8, 3.8] [1.4, 3.0] [4.6, 8.5] [3.6, 10.8] [1.4, 3.2] [0.5, 1.2] [51%, 119%]

The [18F]-FDG metabolism in tumors was measured as the maximum (max) and mean (mean70%) [18F]-FDG uptake within the anatomic tumor volume. Across the cohort, [18F]-FDG uptake was normalized by the injected activity and body weight of the individual mouse (ID/cm3*wt). Tumor metabolism was compared to background metabolism in healthy liver, expressed as the TBR (ID/cm3*wt)/liver, and compared to skeletal muscle in a contralateral limb, expressed as the TMR (ID/cm3*wt)/muscle. The intratumor heterogeneity was calculated by comparing local maxima [18F]-FDG metabolism of subregions within each tumor and was expressed as the differences between highest and lowest of the subregions (range) and between the quartiles (IQR).

NA indicates that caliper measurements were not recorded at the time of imaging.