Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Sex Behav. 2013 Oct 11;42(8):1415–1423. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0190-1

Table 1.

ANOVA results for ratings of kissing importance at initial/established relationship phases by sex, sociosexual orientation (SOI) and self-rated attractiveness

df F Partial η2 p
Within subject effects
 Relationship phase 882 <1 0.001 ns
 Relationship phase × Sex 882 <1 0.001 ns
 Relationship phase × SOI 882 17.34 0.019 .001
 Relationship phase × Attractiveness 882 1.55 0.002 ns
 Relationship phase × Sex × SOI 882 2.32 0.003 ns
 Relationship phase × Sex × Attractiveness 882 <1 0.001 ns
 Relationship phase × SOI × Attractiveness 882 <1 0.001 ns
 Relationship phase × Sex × SOI × Attractiveness 882 <1 0.001 ns
Between subject effects
 Sex 882 32.53 0.036 .001
 SOI 882 5.05 0.006 .025
 Attractiveness 882 11.55 0.013 .001
 Sex × SOI 882 4.42 0.005 .036
 Sex × Attractiveness 882 <1 0.001 ns
 SOI × Attractiveness 882 <1 0.001 ns
 Sex × SOI × Attractiveness 882 1.06 0.001 ns
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure