Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 30;10(6):e0130777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130777

Table 4. Univariate analysis among women who use reusable cloth pads (N = 249) comparing the odds of different MHM practices for washing, drying and storing cloth pads among BV or UTI laboratory confirmed cases and BV or UTI laboratory negative controls (excluding symptomatic controls) (Group 4).

Group 4: BV/UTI lab confirmed
BV or UTI lab positive Cases no (%) (N = 138) BV or UTI lab negative Control no (%) (N = 111) OR 95% CI p-value
Washing place for sanitary cloth
Toilet 89 (69) 45 (78) 1.0
Tube well or yard 18 (14) 5 (8.6) 1.8 0.6–5.2 0.3
Pond or river 23 (18) 8 (13.8) 1.6 0.6–3.5 0.4
Way of washing sanitary cloth
Water and soap 125 (96.2) 54 (96.4) 1.0
With water 5 (3.9) 2 (3.6) 2.3 0.2–5.7 0.9
Drying method for sanitary cloth
In open space or sun 113 (87) 50 (89.3) 1.0
Inside house 17 (13.1) 6 (10.7) 1.3 0.5–3.4 0.7
Store place for sanitary cloth
Wrapped with polythene 116 (89) 52 (93) 1
Wrapped with another material 7 (5.3) 3 (54) 1.04 0.3–4.2 0.9
Wrapped with nothing 8 (6.1) 1 (1.8) 3.6 0.4–29.4 0.2
Placer where sanitary cloth is stored
In the toilet 24 (18.6) 15 (28.3) 1
Hidden within cloths 17 (13.2) 1 (1.9) 10.6 1.3–88.3 0.03
In some place of the changing room 88 (68.2) 37 (69.8) 1.03 0.7–3.1 0.3

*OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval, no = number.

Denominators vary as not all respondents answered all questions.