Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 30;9(6):e0003902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003902

Table 3. Diagnostic performance of the newly developed ICT and the Kalazar Detect Rapid Test in the detection of VL.

Diagnostic parameter Newly developed ICT Kalazar Detect
True positive (tp) 204 202
True negative (tn) 231 229
False positive (fp) 3 5
False negative (fn) 9 11
Sensitivity a 95.8% (95% CI: 92.1–98.1%) 94.8% (95% CI: 91.0–97.4%)
Specificity b 98.7% (95% CI: 96.3–99.7%) 97.9% (95% CI: 95.1–99.3%)
Diagnostic efficiency c 97.3% (95% CI: 95.4–98.6%) 96.4% (95% CI: 94.3–97.9%)

a Sensitivity = tp × 100/(tp + fn)

b Specificity = tn × 100/(tn + fp)

c Diagnostic efficiency = (tn + tp) × 100/(tp + fp + tn + fn)