Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 30;10(6):e0129564. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129564

Table 4. Comparing the Pezzoli, Hund, and Hedt designs for ρ = .1, α = β = .1, and m = 10.

n d k m α β
p l = .55, p u = .7
SRS 71 44 .091 .096
Pezzoli σ l = .16 140 87 14 10 .098 .098
Pezzoli σ u = .14 130 81 13 10 .099 .087
Hund ρ = .1 140 87 14 10 .091 .087
Hedt ρ = .1 140 87 14 10 .087 .099
p l = .75, p u = .9
SRS 40 33 .100 .096
Pezzoli σ l = .14 110 90 11 10 .063 .095
Pezzoli σ u = .09 80 66 8 10 .075 .071
Hund ρ = .1 90 74 9 10 .093 .071
Hedt ρ = .1 90 75 9 10 .088 .073
p l = .9, p u = .95
SRS 187 173 .087 .098
Pezzoli σ l = .09 410 379 41 10 .093 .098
Pezzoli σ u = .07 320 296 32 10 .088 .094
Hund ρ = .1 360 332 36 10 .093 .090
Hedt ρ = .1 370 343 37 10 .089 .085