Table 1. The questionnaire distributed to the students with their responses to the flipped classroom approach.

Sample No.	Content and structure	Response					Mean rating	Total
		1	2	3	4	5
1	At the beginning of the each session, all educational objectives were clearly defined	79 (61)	33 (25)	18 (14)	0	0	1.5	130
2	The worksheet given prior to the session was very useful to understand the topic	92 (71)	28 (21)	10 (8)	0	0	1.3	130
3	The sources given in the worksheet such as- references and web sources kindled interest to read	98 (76)	27 (21)	3 (2)	2 (1)	0	1.3	130
4	This method was more engaging and interesting in comparison to traditional class	101 (78)	26 (20)	3 (2)	0	0	1.2	130
5	This module provided sufficient knowledge of anatomical basis of neurosurgical disease localization and approaches [Deeper understanding]	92 (71)	27 (21)	8 (6)	3 (2)	0	1.3	130
6	More such modules should be organized in the future	110 (85)	11 (8)	9 (7)	0	0	1.2	130
7	Time allotted for the cases were adequate	89 (68)	11 (9)	10 (8)	12 (9)	8 (6)	1.7	130
8	This method made me participate actively with the subject	75 (58)	26 (20)	9 (7)	12 (9)	8 (6)	1.8	130
9	Enjoyable way of learning	95 (73)	26 (20)	9 (7)	0	0	1.3	130
10	The team based activity enabled me to go through the topic prior to the module	91 (70)	26 (20)	11 (9)	2 (1)	0	1.4	130

Values are presented as number of responses to each statement (%). Response: 1, strongly agree; 2, agree; 3, neutral; 4, disagree; 5, strongly disagree.