Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 1;10(7):e0131865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131865

Table 3. Substrate specificity of Dao enzymes.

Protein RtDao CgDao1 CgDao2 CgDao3 Concordance with growth phenotypes a
D-Ala 41.22 0.040 0.218* 0.043 Yes-dao2Δ
D-Asp 0.97 0.916* 0.053 0.049 Yes b
D-Glu 73.86 0.049 0.080 0.032 No-dao3Δ
D-His 41.26 0.049 0.128* 0.031 Yes-dao2Δ
D-Leu 15.84 0.044 0.153* 0.045 Yes-dao2Δ
D-Met 27.77 0.050 0.64* 0.040 Yes-dao2Δ
D-Phe 3.97 0.046 0.043 0.031 No-dao2Δ
D-Pro 39.81 0.054 0.136* 0.041 Yes-dao2Δ
D-Ser 31.13 0.062 0.129* 0.044 Yes-dao2Δ
D-Thr 17.70 0.040 0.052 0.036 No-dao2Δ
D-Val 50.55 0.055 1.009* 0.039 Yes-dao2Δ

a Substrate specificity of CgDao enzymes (nM H2O2/ug crude extract) was compared to the growth phenotypes of Cgdao mutants listed in Table 2. “Yes” or “No” designates whether the ability to oxidize D-amino acid is concordant with the growth phenotypes of the specified CgdaoΔ mutant. The experiments were repeated twice and the representative data are shown.

b CgDao1 showed the clearest concordant substrate specificity with Cgdao1Δ growth phenotype.

* Activity is at least two fold higher than the control activity of CgDao using L-amino acid as substrate.