Skip to main content
. 2015 May 19;14:52. doi: 10.1186/s12937-015-0041-0

Table 5.

Comparison of the results of FFMDXA and FFMBIA for different %BF subgroupsa

Female: BF%DXA <20 % (n = 20) 20 % - 30 % (n = 80) 30 %-40 % (n = 94) >40 % (n = 61) Total (n = 257)
FFMDXA (kg) 41.8 ± 3.8 41.8 ± 5.2 38.4 ± 4.7 40.9 ± 6.9 40.3 ± 5.6
(35, 48) (29, 52) (29, 51) (30, 58) (29, 58)
FFMBIA (kg) 39.2 ± 3.6 40.3 ± 4.7 38.9 ± 4.4 42.9 ± 6.7 40.3 ± 5.2
(32, 45) (29, 51) (28, 51) (31, 60) (28, 59)
Bias ± SDb (kg) −2.6 ± 1.7 −1.5 ± 2.8 0.5 ± 2.7 2.0 ± 2.9 0.0 ± 3.0
r,c 0.90 0.91 0.89 0.94 0.87
P ,d 0.04* 0.06 0.43 0.11 0.92
Slope,e 0.86 0.83 0.79 0.89 0.79
Intercept,e 3.17 5.34 9.77 6.70 8.41
Male: BF%DXA <10 % (n = 46) 10 % - 20 % (n = 96) 20 % - 30 % (n = 104) >30 % (n = 51) Total (n = 297)
FFMDXA(kg) 60.9 ± 5.2 58.6 ± 7.0 58.2 ± 7.9 57.9 ± 7.7 50.1 ± 11.4
(47, 71) (33, 76) (46, 86) (46, 77) (33, 86)
FFMBIA(kg) 58.6 ± 3.8 58.1 ± 5.3 58.6 ± 6.7 60.0 ± 7.4 50.0 ± 10.9
(52, 67) (39, 74) (48, 79) (47, 79) (40, 79.2)
Bias ± SDb(kg) −2.3 ± 2.5 −0.5 ± 3.2 0.4 ± 3.1 2.1 ± 3.2 0.0 ± 3.2
r,c 0.89 0.90 0.93 0.91 0.89
P ,d 0.02* 0.59 0.68 0.16 0.97
Slopee 0.65 0.68 0.79 0.87 0.70
Intercepte 19.13 18.52 12.71 9.60 17.41

aAll values are mean ± SD; minimum and maximum in parentheses

bThe biases and standard deviations between FFMDXA and FFMBIA indifferent subgroups

cThe correlation coefficients of FFMDXA and FFMBIA in different subgroups

dThe results of paired t-tests between FFMDXA and FFMBIA indifferent subgroups

eThe slopes and intercepts of the regression model of FFMDXA and FFMBIA indifferent subgroups

*Denotes significantly different at the .05 level