. 2015 Jul 2;3:23. doi: 10.1186/s40337-015-0061-3

Table 3.

Summary of the Hierarchical Regression Analysis Predicting BID-Change (n = 193)

Model	Variable	B	SEB	β	R ²	R ² change	P
1	Intercept	-.081	.162
	Pre-thin-ideal internalisation	.015	.004	.296			.000**
	Pre-self-esteem	-.030	.040	-.055			.451
					.100	.100
2	Intercept	-.136	.178
	Pre-thin-ideal internalisation	.007	.004	.136			.110
	Pre-self-esteem	-.005	.041	-.010			.895
	AC	.066	.020	.267			.001**
	Exposure	.054	.041	.096			.182
					.155	.055
3	Intercept	-.139	.178
	Pre-thin-ideal internalisation	.007	.004	.136			.108
	Pre-self-esteem	-.013	.043	-.023			.764
	AC	.073	.024	.298			.002**
	Exposure	.056	.041	.098			.172
	AC*exposure	-.022	.035	-.057			.540
					.157	.002

Note. The dependent variable was BID-change; B = unstandardized regression coefficient; SEB = standard error of the coefficient; β = standardized coefficient; *p < .05, **p < .01