Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 2;5:11323. doi: 10.1038/srep11323

Table 2. Multiple Logistic regression analysis of factors associated with infection with pCRFs and URFs, as compared to conventional subtypes (B, C, CRF01_AE, CRF07_BC, and CRF08_BC).

Total, n (%) Conventional
pCRFs
URFs
pCRFs
URFs
72 (35.1%) 54 (26.3%) 79 (38.5%) Crude OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI) Crude OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Year of diagnosis
 2009 22 (40.7%) 20 (37.0%) 12 (2.2%) 1   1  
 2010 20 (40.8%) 12 (24.5%) 17 (34.7%) 0.66 (0.26–1.69)   1.56 (0.60–4.05)  
 2011 12 (27.9%) 7 (16.3%) 24 (55.8%) 0.64 (0.21–1.95)   3.67 (1.37–9.84)*  
 2012 18 (30.5%) 15 (25.4%) 26 (44.1%) 0.92 (0.37–2.29)   2.69 (1.05–6.68)*  
Sex
 Female 41 (39.4%) 28 (26.9%) 35 (33.7%) 1   1  
 Male 31 (30.7%) 26 (25.7%) 44 (43.6%) 1.23 (0.60–2.50)   1.66 (0.87–3.17)  
Ethnicity
 Han 35 (42.2%) 24 (28.9%) 24 (28.9%) 1   1  
 Jingpo (minority) 16 (25.4%) 19 (30.2%) 28 (44.4%) 1.73 (0.75–4.03)   2.55 (1.14–5.71)*  
 Other minority 21 (35.6%) 11 (18.6%) 27 (45.8%) 0.76 (0.31–1.87)   1.87 (0.87–4.06)  
Education level
 Junior and above 36 (43.9%) 28 (34.1%) 18 (22.0%) 1 1 1 1
 No schooling and Primary 36 (29.3%) 26 (21.1%) 61 (49.6%) 0.93 (0.46–1.88) 0.81 (0.38–1.74) 3.39 (1.68– 6.82)* 2.541(1.09–5.36)*
Occupation
 Not farmer 48 (31.4%) 40 (26.1%) 65 (42.5%) 1   1  
 Farmer 24 (46.2%) 14 (26.9%) 14 (26.9%) 1.43 (0.65–3.12)   2.32 (1.09–4.95)*  
Residence
 Luxi County 37 (44.6%) 26 (31.3%) 20 (24.1%) 1 1 1 1
 Other Dehong county 21 (27.6%) 23 (30.3%) 32 (42.1%) 1.56 (0.72–3.39) 1.56 (0.70–3.49) 2.82(1.30–6.11)* 2.90 (1.28–6.60)*
 Myanmar 10 (27.8%) 2 (5.6%) 24 (66.7%) 0.29 (0.06–1.41) 0.28 (0.54–1.41) 4.44 (1.78–11.1) * 3.17 (1.20–8.39)*
 Other region in China 4 (40.0%) 3 (30.0%) 3 (30.0%) 1.07 (0.22–5.18) 1.18 (0.21–6.51) 1.39 (0.28–6.82) 1.79 (0.26–12.4)
High-risk contact history
 Heterosexual 54 (35.5%) 43 (28.3%) 55 (36.2%) 1   1  
 Injecting drug use 10 (25.0%) 10 (25.0%) 20 (50.0%) 1.26 (0.48–3.29)   1.96 (0.84–4.58)  
 MSM 4 (66.7%) 0 (0%) 2 (33.3%)    
 Not available 4 (57.1%) 2 (28.6%) 1 (14.3%)    

*OR greater than one for both upper and lower bound of 95% CI.

The high-risk contact category “MSM” , as well as the “Not available” category was excluded from analysis due to its small number of cases. Cases were designated missing “-”.