Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 8;1(2):110–125. doi: 10.1021/id500033m

Table 2. Data Collection and Refinement Statistics.

crystal ChsE4-ChsE5/FADH2a
space group C 1 2 1
cell dimensions  
a, b, c (Å) 185.7, 108.1, 82.0
α, β, γ (deg) 90.0, 93.0, 90.0
data collectionb  
resolution (Å) 46.4–2.0 (2.00–1.99)
wavelength (Å) 0.9792
reflections  
observed 739 658 (7336)
unique 109 767 (1104)
Rmergec 0.076 (0.624)
Rmeasd 0.082 (0.700)
Ranome 0.057 (0.588)
Rpimf 0.031 (0.262)
CC1/2g 0.999 (0.939)
II 19.9 (2.9)
completeness (%) 99.9 (99.8)
multiplicity 6.7 (6.6)
Wilson B 28.9
refinementb  
resolution (Å) 46.4–2.0 (2.05–1.99)
no. reflections 104 247 (7657)
Rwork/Rfree 0.1508/0.1862
CC*g 1.000 (0.984)
no. atoms  
protein 11 396
FADH2 106
solvent 899
B factors  
protein 36.6
FADH2 32.5
solvent 42.5
RMS deviations  
bond lengths (Å) 0.017
bond angles (deg) 0.84
Ramachandran  
favored (%) 98
allowed (%) 2
outliers (%) 0
PDB ID 4X28
a

See Figure S5.

b

Values in parentheses are for the highest-resolution shell.

c

The merging R factor describes the deviation of an individual intensity measurement from the mean value of all of its symmetry-equivalent reflections.

d

The redundancy-independent merging R factor, Rrim or Rmeas, indicates the precision of an individual intensity measurement independently of the multiplicity of that measurement.

e

The precision-indicating merging R factor, Rpim, describes the precision of the averaged intensity measurement.

f

The anomalous R factor quantifies the relative differences in Friedel-related reflections.

g

CC1/2 and CC* are statistics for assessing the effective resolution limits and quality of diffraction data in the context of a refined model.31