. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 2.

Published in final edited form as: Subst Use Misuse. 2009;44(0):1329–1348. doi: 10.1080/10826080902961419

Table 2.

Hierarchical multiple regression analyses predicting justification for using coercive strategies to have sex without a condom (N = 72)

Variable	Justification for using coercive strategies
Variable	B	SE B	β	Δ R ²
Step 1: Survey session				.126
Usual alcohol consumption	−.001	.001	−.069
Usual condom use	−.010	.017	−.072
Perpetration status	.192	.074	.313^*
Hostility	.021	.053	.047
Frequency of misperception	.006	.007	.090
Step 2: Laboratory session				.009
Drink condition	−.066	.079	−.102
Step 3: Two-way interactions				.262^*
Drink × perpetration status	−.244	.147	−.296
Drink × hostility	.311	.115	393^**
Drink × misperception	.047	.018	.383^**
Perpetration × hostility	−.132	.102	−.224
Perpetration × misperception	−.008	.014	−.094
Hostility × misperception	.013	.009	.168

Note. Drink condition: 0 = no alcohol consumed (placebo and sober groups); 1 = alcohol consumed. Perpetration status: 0 = no past sexual assault perpetration; 1 = past sexual assault perpetration.

p < .05.

^**

p < .01.