Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 2.
Published in final edited form as: Inorg Chem. 2005 Mar 21;44(6):1826–1836. doi: 10.1021/ic0487068

Table 1.

Detailed Results for Experimental Concurrent Fits to the Abs and MCD Spectroscopic Data and ROHF-CISD and DFT Calculations on Complex 1ac

DFT
ROHF–CISD
Abs MCD ΔE ψiψf ΔE ψiψf fosc
1 <5000 5300 3dxz,yz → 3dxy 4800 3dxz,yz → 3dxy 14
2 ~5000 7800 5520 13
3 11120 10580
4 13230 13070 12900 Sπ → 3dxy 13430 Sπ → 3dxy 534
5 14830 14650 15100 N3 → 3dxy
6 16540 16300 19810 Sπ → 3dxy 1393
7 17930 17780 19830 3d → 3d 66
8 19640 19480 20280 88
9 21020 21220 21300 Sπ → 3dxy 21180 N3 → 3dxy 99
10 22500 23240 23980
3dxz,yz3dz2
559
11 24520 24880 24570 243
12 26280 26560 26100
Sπ3dx2y2
25120
Sπ3dx2y2
260
13 28970 28310
14 32140 30010 29800
Sσ3dx2y2
27500
Sσ3dx2y2
4182
15 33760 31740 29460 523
a

Calculated excited-state energies were obtained from calculations using crystallographic coordinates.

b

Experimental (Abs, MCD) and Calculated (ΔE for DFT49 and ROHF–CISD) transition energies are given in wavenumbers. Calculated oscillator strengths (fosc) are given in 105.

c

The correlation between the experimental bands and calculated transitions is complex in this case; see Figure 2 for details.