Table 6. Concordance between manual and automated analysis according to the counting method and the algorithm.

	Retrospective series (Algorithm 1)		Prospective series (Algorithm 2)
	1p	19q	1p	19q
	Manual / Automated	Manual / Automated	Manual / Automated	Manual / Automated
Combination	46/53 (87%) - 0.80	41/53 (77%) - 0.67	42/45 (93%) - 0.85	40/45 (89%) - 0.77
Ratio	43/53 (81%) - 0.69	46/53 (87%) - 0.68	34/45 (76%) - 0.63	32/45 (71%) - 0.58
Combination + Ratio	46/53 (87%) - 0.80	44/53 (83%) - 0.74	41/45 (91%) - 0.77	40/45 (89%) - 0.74
C + R (100 cells)	46/53 (87%) - 0.80	44/53 (83%) - 0.74	41/45 (91%) - 0.77	40/45 (89%) - 0.74
C + R (200 cells)	46/53 (87%) - 0.80	45/53 (85%) - 0.76	45/45 (100%) - 1	45/45 (100%) - 1

Number of cases (%) - Κ coefficient. C + R: Combination + Ratio.