. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 2.

Published in final edited form as: Hippocampus. 2012 Oct 4;23(2):169–186. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22079

TABLE 1.

Relationship Between Cluster Isolation Quality and the Degree of Remapping

	Epoch 1 vs. 2	Epoch 2 vs. 3	Epoch 1 vs. 3
CA CD CA⁰ sessions
L-ratio	0.025 (0.800)	0.048 (0.620)	−0.082 (0.410)
Isolation distance	0.050 (0.610)	−0.046 (0.640)	0.073 (0.460)
DA CD DA⁰ sessions
L-ratio	−0.136 (0.188)	−0.119 (0.250)	−0.106 (0.306)
Isolation distance	−0.010 (0.920)	0.070 (0.499)	−0.019 (0.856)

For CA-CD-CA⁰ sessions, there was no relationship between remapping and field location. However for DA-CD-DA⁰ sessions, there was a significant relationship between remapping and field location (v²(4) = 11.61, P = 0.02). The significant result was largely driven by the fact that all of the fields that were located on the stem remapped, with 12/14 (86%) showing epoch remapping, and 2/14 (14%) showing task remapping.