Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 2;10(7):e0131935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131935

Table 1. Groups of strains studied for which statistical comparisons of repeat content and pathogenicity were performed.

All strains (N = 126) Strains with intact I-E genes (N = 71)
Comparison Group of strains compared No. of strains Median repeat no. Repeat no. range No. of strains Median repeat no. Repeat no. range
A 1. Commensal 28 29.5 0–53 22 38.0 6–53
2. Pathogenic 98 12 0–42 49 21.0 5–42
B 1. Commensal 28 29.5 0–53 22 38.0 6–53
2. EnPEC 50 18 0–42 35 23.0 11–42
3. ExPEC 43 2 0–29 11 19.0 5–29
C 1. EIEC 9 10 3–42 3 24.0 15–42
2. EPEC 10 14 0–33 6 17.5 9–33
3. ETEC 5 23 12–40 4 26.0 22–40
4. EHEC 17 21 6–35 16 25.0 7–35
D 1. EnPEC (ECOR) 41 13 0–42 23 25.0 2–42
2. EnPEC (non-ECOR) 31 14 0–40 18 19.0 2–40
E 1. n = 0 UPEC genes a 63 21 0–53 49 26 6–53
2. n = 1 UPEC genes a 23 13 0–29 12 20.5 7–29
3. n = 2 UPEC genes a 22 2 0–31 9 19 14–31
4. n = 3 UPEC genes a 7 2 1–5 1 5 -
5. n = 4 UPEC genes a 11 2 0–2 0 - -

aStrains with the same total number of UPEC factors considered in the study.