Table 3.
Generation |
# of plants
scored a |
# of plants that are
triple heterozygotes a, b |
Estimated maximum %
contribution of recurrent parent genome to selected backcross plant c |
Expected % contribution
of recurrent parent genome to selected backcross plant d |
---|---|---|---|---|
BC1F1 | 360 | 14 | 77.5 | 77.5 |
BC2F1 | 122 | 9 | 91.8 | 91.8 |
BC3F1 | 285 | 14 | 97 | 97 |
aAt each backcross generation, genomic DNA was isolated from derivative lines and genotyping was performed using primers that are tightly linked to BB resistant genes as described in Materials and methods.
bAt each backcross generation, fewer than expected triple heterozygotes were obtained. This is due to the fact that some of the
putative backcross progeny were obtained by inadvertent selfing of Jalmagna (the female parent in these backcrosses).
cAt each backcross generation, genomic DNA was isolated from derivative lines that are triple heterozygotes for BB resistant gene linked markers. Microsatellite markers that are polymorphic between the parental lines were then used, as described in Materials and Methods, to identify the plant with maximum recurrent parent genome contribution.
dAs per Mendelian ratios for independent gene action.