Table 3.

Comparison by Modality and Complete vs Imputed Data of Patients Response on IIEF Sexual Desire Subscale and Overall Sexual Satisfaction Subscale

	Erectile Function Subscale				Overall Sexual Satisfaction Subscale
	Completed IIEF		Imputed IIEF		Completed IIEF		Imputed IIEF
	3D-CRT 79.2 Gy	IMRT 79.2 Gy	3D-CRT 79.2 Gy	IMRT 79.2 Gy	3D-CRT 79.2 Gy	IMRT 79.2 Gy	3D-CRT 79.2 Gy	IMRT 79.2 Gy
Baseline	n=338	n=169	n=377	n=200	n=338	n=169	n=377	n=200
Median	15.0	12.0	14	11.5	8.0	8.0	8.0	7.5
Range	(1, 30)	(1, 30)	(1,30)	(0,30)	(2, 10)	(2, 10)	(0, 10)	(0, 10)
Δ from baseline
6 mos	n=195	n=88	n=236	n=115	n=195	n=88	n=236	n=115
Median	−1.0	0.0	0	0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
Range	(−26, 23)	(−26,20)	(−26,23)	(−26,21)	(−8, 7)	(−8, 8)	(−10,7)	(−8,10)
12 mos	n=215	n=112	n=255	n=144	n=215	n=112	n=255	n=144
Median	−1.0	−1.0	−1	−1	0.0	−0.5	−1	0.0
Range	(−28, 28)	(−29, 18)	(−28,28)	(−29,25)	(−8, 7)	(−8, 8)	(−8,7)	(−8,8)
24 mos	n=212	n=98	n=263	n=130	n=212	n=98	n=263	n=130
Median	−2.0	−1.0	−2	−1	−1.0	0.0	−1	0.0
Range	(−29, 23)	(−5, 18)	(−29,23)	(−29,23)	(−8, 5)	(−8, 5)	(−10,7)	(−10,10)

Δ =change; Using Wilcoxon non-parametric test, there’s no significant difference existed.