Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Jan 1;34(6):1306–1320. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2387336

Table I.

Mean of the PSNR and FSIM for 16 Foveal Images from 16 Different Subjects Reconstructed by JPEG 2000, MPEG-4, SPIHT [47], K-SVD [29], SRC-Dif, 2D-ASRC, 3D-ASRC-WA, and 3D-ASRC Under Seven Different Compression Ratios Ranging from 10–40.

Method/Compression ratio 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
JPEG 2000 19.67/0.65 20.33/0.67 20.70/0.69 21.34/0.70 21.92/0.70 22.41/0.71 22.78/0.71
MPEG-4 20.42/0.72 22.44/0.78 22.63/0.79 22.71/0.79 22.76/0.79 23.21/0.78 23.22/0.79
SPIHT 25.56/0.80 26.17/0.82 26.50/0.82 26.68/0.82 26.79/0.82 26.86/0.82 26.89/0.82
K-SVD 20.74/0.68 22.51/0.70 22.51/0.72 23.06/0.74 23.56/0.75 23.94/0.75 24.28/0.76
SRC-Dif 26.98/0.85 27.26/0.86 27.45/0.87 27.54/0.87 27.56/0.87 27.58/0.86 27.55/0.86
2D-ASRC 26.14/0.81 26.51/0.82 26.73/0.82 26.85/0.83 26.89/0.83 26.91/0.83 26.99/0.83
3D-ASRC-WA 26.31/0.82 26.70/0.83 26.97/0.84 27.11/0.85 27.23/0.85 27.29/0.85 27.33/0.85
3D-ASRC 27.60/0.88 27.65/0.87 27.68/0.87 27.71/0.87 27.75/0.87 27.75/0.87 27.74/0.87