Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun;27(3):309–317. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2015.06.01

Table 2. Relationship between clinical characteristics and cytoreductive outcomes.

Characteristics Optimal debulking*
Suboptimal debulking**
P
n % n %
FIGO stage 0.360
    III 40 49.4 41 50.6
    IV 3 33.3 6 66.7
Grade 0.636
    1 2 66.7 1 33.3
    2 5 38.5 8 61.5
    3 36 48.6 38 51.4
Histopathology 0.059
    Serous 32 55.2 26 44.8
    Non-serous 11 34.4 21 65.6
Preoperative HE4 (pmol/L) <0.001
    <473 24 72.7 9 27.3
    ≥473 19 33.3 38 66.7
Preoperative CA125 (U/mL) 0.033
    <500 17 65.4 9 34.6
    ≥500 26 40.6 38 59.4
Lymph node status <0.001
    No lymphadenectomy 2 6.7 28 93.3
    Negative 17 73.9 6 26.1
    Positive 24 64.9 13 35.1
Ascites [median (range)] (mL) 0.022
    ≤1,000 [200 (0-1,000)] 25 61 16 39
    >1,000 [3,000 (1,500-8,500)] 18 36.7 31 63.3

*, “optimal” was identified using the threshold of ≤1 cm residual disease; **, “suboptimal” was with residual disease >1 cm. FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; HE4, human epididymis protein 4.