Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 1;29(6):640–649. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0670

Table 1.

Characteristics of Included Studies and the Main Outcomes of Included Studies

Study Design Participants Interventions Incidence of CRBDa Severity of CRBDa Other outcomea Adverse effectsa
Muscarinic antagonists
Zhang et al.5 Randomized, prospective single-blind 116 patients with nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer undergoing TURBT G1: solifenacin 5 mg, 6 h before surgery and after surgery 5 mg/day for 2 weeks, po (n=58) 6 h: 67.2% vs 93.1%
12 h: 62.1% vs 82.8%
24 h: 56.9% vs 79.3%
48 h: 48.3% vs 62.1%
72 h: 32.8% vs 48.3% (p<0.05)
The severity of CRBD (mild, moderate, severe) was significantly reduced in group 1 compared with group 2 (p=0.008) Overactive bladder symptom scores: 5.67 vs 7.86 (p<.001) Dry mouth: 10.3% vs 6.9% (p=0.743)
Constipation:8.6% vs 3.4% (p=0.438)
Headache:1.7% vs 0 (p=1.0)
Dizziness:1.7% vs 0 (p=1.0)
      G2: placebo (n=58)        
Ryu et al.6 Randomized, prospective double-blind 57 male patients with CRBD after elective urologic surgery for the upper urinary tract or robotic retropubic radical prostatectomy G1: butylscopolamine 20 mg/iv (n=28) 1 h: 59 (12) vs 41 (22)
2 h: 50 (16) vs 32 (25)
6 h: 40 (21) vs 23 (18) (p=0.01)b
Rescue analgesics (<0.01)
None: 24% vs 54%
Once: 48% vs 46%
Twice: 28% vs 0
Dry mouth: 93% vs 93% (p>0.99)
PONV: one in each group
      G2: normal saline 1 mL/iv (n=29)        
Nam et al.15 Randomized, prospective double-blind 99 patients undergoing nonurologic surgeries G1: butylscopolamine 20 mg/iv (n=49) Overall: 31% vs 66%
1 h: 27% vs 54%
2 h: 22% vs 42%
6 h: 10% vs 26%
(p<0.05)
First 6 h postoperatively was less in the butylscopolamine group than the control group (median [interquartile range], 0 [0–17] vs 22 [0–47], respectively; p=0.002) Rescue analgesics: 2% vs 8% (p=0.362) Dry mouth: 86% vs 94% (p=0.20)
PONV: 4% vs 14% (p=0.16)
      G2: placebo (n=50)        
Tauzin-Fin et al.7 Randomized, prospective double-blind 46 men undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy G1: oxybutynin 5 mg/po, every 8 h during the 24 h after surgery (n=23) 17% vs 65% (p<0.01)   Cumulative tramadol consumption (mg) [mean (SD)]: 146 (48) vs 322.9 (124.3) (p<0.01)
Patient satisfaction scorec: 8 (7–9) vs 5 (4–5) (p<0.001)
No patient in group oxybutynin reported a dry mouth
      G2: placebo, po (n=23)        
Agarwal et al.8 Randomized, prospective double-blind 234 patients undergoing elective PCNL surgery for renal and upper ureteral stone G1: oxybutynin 5 mg/po (n=78) 35% vs 33% vs 58% (p<0.05) Significant reduction was observed after oxybutynin and tolterodine therapy compared with control (p<0.05) There were no differences in fentanyl consumption between the groups Dry mouth (p<0.05)
0 h:51.3% vs 46.2% vs 19.2%
1 h: 59% vs 55.1% vs 24.4%
      G2: tolterodine 2 mg/po (n=78)        
      G3: placebo, po (n=78)        
Agarwal et al.1 Randomized, prospective double-blind 215 patients undergoing elective endoscopic or open urologic surgery for the kidney and ureter G1: tolterodine 2 mg/po, 1 h before induction of anesthesia (n=50) 0 h: 17% vs 82%
1 h: 18% vs 91%
2 h: 15% vs 83%
6 h: 10% vs 60%
(p<0.05)
Dry mouth
0 h: 54% vs 22% (p<0.05)
1 h: 66% vs 47% (p<0.05)
There were no differences at 2 and 6 h
      G2: placebo, po (n=165)        
Anesthetics
Shariat et al.9 Randomized, prospective double-blind 114 patients undergoing an elective nephrectomy G1: ketamine 0.5 mg/kg/iv after induction of anesthesia, but before urinary catheterization (n=57) At 0 and 1 h in recovery: 38.6% (22/57), 22.8% (13/57) vs 68.4% (39/57), 57.9% (33/57), respectively (p<0.001) At 2 and 6 h, the incidence and severity were not significantly different between the two groups (p>0.05) Sedation: at 0 h:12% vs 0 (p<0.05)
A decreased incidence of PONV was observed at 2- and 6-h visits in the intervention group
      G2: normal saline 2 mL/iv (n=57)        
Safavi et al.10 Randomized, prospective double-blind 120 patients undergoing urological surgery who complained of CRBD in the recovery room G1: ketamine 150 μg/kg/iv (n=30) Significantly less in G2 and 3 compared with G1 and 4 till 24 h after operation (p<0.05) Rescue analgesic consumption: significantly less in G2 and 3 compared with G1 and 4 (p<0.05). No significant difference was noted between G2 and 3 (p>0.05) Sedation: lower in 15 min and 30 min in recovery in G2 and 3 compared with G4 and 1 (p<0.05)
There was no significant difference between G2 and 3 (p>0.05)
      G2: ketamine 200 μg/kg/iv (n=30)        
      G3: ketamine 250 μg/kg/iv (n=30)       There was no significant difference between G2 and 3 (p>0.05)
      G4: normal saline, 2 mL/iv (n=30)        
Agarwal et al.11 Randomized, prospective double-blind 54 patients undergoing elective PCNL for renal and upper ureteral stone and who spontaneously complained of CRBD, after operation G1: ketamine 250 μg/kg/iv (n=27) 2 h: 20% vs 92%
6 h: 19% vs 84%
(p<0.05)
Moderate (p<0.05)
1 h: 4% vs 64%
Sedation (p<0.05)
1 h: 64% vs 4%
2 h: 92% vs 0
      G2: normal saline, 2 mL/iv (n=27)        
Agarwal et al.12 Randomized, prospective double-blind 54 patients undergoing elective PCNL for renal and upper ureteral stone G1: tramadol 1.5 mg/kg/iv (n=27) 0 h: 28% vs 60%
1 h: 32% vs 64%
2 h: 28% vs 56%
6 h: 20% vs 48%
(p<0.05)
Postoperative fentanyl requirement (mg/kg): 210 (34.6) vs 176 (SD 26.5) (p<0.05) Sedation: 60% (15/25) vs 16% (4/25) (p<0.05)
Vomiting: 40% (10/25) vs 12% (3/25) (p<0.05)
Nausea: 56% (14/25) vs 20% (5/25) (p<0.05)
      G2: normal saline, 2 mL/iv (n=27)        
Analgesics
Ergenoglu et al.13 Randomized, prospective double-blind 64 patients undergoing elective PCNL G1: paracetamol 15 mg/kg/iv (n=32) Postoperative (p<0.05)
0 h: 68.75% vs 87.5%
1 h: 62.5% vs 84.4%
2 h:59.4% vs 78.1%
4 h: 37.5% vs 78.1%
6 h: 28.2% vs 68.75%
Moderate (p<0.05)
1 h: 21.9% vs 43.8%
2 h: 9.4% vs 43.8%
4 h: 3.1% vs 56.3%
6 h: 0 vs 37.5%
Total consumption of meperidine: 52.72 [63.73] mg vs 75.81 [58.16] mg (p<0.05); Patient satisfaction scores: 4.53 (0.51) vs 3.84 (0.95) (p=0.002) No patients required rescue analgesia
      G2: normal saline, 1.5 mL/kg/iv (n=32)        
Antiepileptics
Bala et al.4 Randomized, prospective double-blind 100 patients undergoing TURBT G1: gabapentin 1200 mg/po (n=34) Postoperative (p<0.05)
1 h: 0 vs 9% vs 66%
2 h: 26% vs 42% vs 90%
4 h: 18% vs 66% vs 87%
6 h: 9% vs 63% vs 87%
12 h: 0 vs 57% vs 87%
24 h: 0 vs 15% vs 84%
1 h: Mild: 9% vs 0 vs 43.8%
2 h: Moderate: 0 vs 0 vs 43.8%
4 h: Mild: 61.8% (G1) vs 18.2% (G2), moderate: 3% vs 0 vs 39.4%
6, 12, 24 h: moderate: 3% vs 0 vs 45.5%
The number needed to treat was 6 and 2 in G1 and G2, respectively Blood pressure were comparable among groups
Hypotension or bradycardia: None
Dizziness: 1 vs 2 vs 0 (number)
      G2: gabapentin 600 mg/po (n=33)        
      G3: placebo, po (n=33)        
Agarwal et al.3 Randomized, prospective double-blind 108 patients undergoing elective PCNL for renal and upper ureteral stone G1: gabapentin 600 mg/po (n=54) The absolute risk reduction in G2 observed was 30%
0 h: 50% vs 80%
1 h: 61% vs 80%
2 h: 55% vs 76%
6 h: 37% vs 61%
Mild: 0 h: 78% vs 21%, 6 h: 80% vs 39%
Moderate: 1 h: 61% vs 30%, 6 h: 20% vs 57%
Severe: 0 h: 0 vs 42%, 1 h: 0 vs 40%, 2 h: 3% vs 25%
Number-needed-to-treat was 4 in G2. Requiring fentanyl (Number) (p<0.05): 0 h: 0 vs 7, 1 h: 3 vs 12, 2 h: 2 vs 10, 6 h: 1 vs 8 There were no differences in postoperative sedation, PONV, feeling of light-headedness, or headache between the groups (p<0.05)
      G2: placebo, po (n=54)        
Srivastava et al.14 Randomized, prospective double-blind 60 patients undergoing elective spine surgery G1: pregabalin 150 mg/po (n=30) 0 h: 36.7% vs 70%
1 h: 36.7% vs 66.7%
2 h: 30% vs 60%
6 h: 16.7% vs 50%
(p<0.05)
Mild: 0 h: 23.3% vs 13.3%, 6 h: 13.3% vs 30%
Moderate: 0 h: 13.3% vs 16.7%, 6 h: 3% vs 13%
Severe: 0 h: 0 vs 40%, 2 h: 0 vs 20%, 6 h: 0% vs 6.7%
Fentanyl requirements (ug): 211.83[43.54] vs 355.33[51.44] (p<0.05)b Sedation score: 2.63 [0.67] vs 2.10 [0.61] (p=0.002); no significant differences in other side-effects between the two groups
      G2: placebo, po (n=30)        
a

Interventions vs placebo.

b

Values are given as mean (SD) or number of patients (%).

c

Patient satisfaction score is given as values that are expressed as median (interquartile range).

CBRD, catheter-related bladder discomfort; G=group; OABSS=Overactive bladder symptom scores; PCNL=percutaneous nephrolithotomy; PONV=postoperative nausea and vomiting; TURBT=transurethral resection of bladder tumors.