Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Community Health. 2015 Aug;40(4):633–641. doi: 10.1007/s10900-014-9978-8

Table 2.

MIRs for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostate cancers, by urban/rural

Urban
Rural
# of counties Mean ± SE p # of counties Mean ± SE p
Breast
No accessa 9 0.253 ± 0.015 <0.001 50 0.231 ± 0.009 0.160
Indirect accessb 228 0.201 ± 0.003 336 0.214 ± 0.003
Direct accessc 590 0.191 ± 0.002 399 0.218 ± 0.003
Cervix
No access 0 NA 0 NA
Indirect access 11 0.416 ± 0.028 <0.001 2 0.583 ± 0.068 0.235
Direct access 216 0.314 ± 0.006 5 0.438 ± 0.038
Colorectal
No access 13 0.413 ± 0.020 0.028 89 0.394 ± 0.010 0.821
Indirect access 256 0.390 ± 0.005 488 0.401 ± 0.004
Direct access 622 0.377 ± 0.003 531 0.401 ± 0.004
Prostate
No access 5 0.225 ± 0.025 <0.001 30 0.202 ± 0.013 0.919
Indirect access 196 0.187 ± 0.004 262 0.202 ± 0.004
Direct access 562 0.169 ± 0.002 328 0.200 ± 0.004

Bold values indicate statistical significant (p < 0.05)

MIR Mortality-to-Incidence Ratio, SE Standard Error, NA Data not available

a

No FQHC delivery site both in the county and adjacent counties

b

No FQHC delivery site in the county, but any in adjacent counties

c

Any FQHC delivery sites in the county