Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 21;2015:970357. doi: 10.1155/2015/970357

Table 5.

Image processing error measurements in second observer subset. Image processing error measurements in the second observer subset (n = 24) as dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and point to curve (P2C) for second observer manual delineation versus manual reference delineation and for automatic segmentation versus manual reference delineation.

Automatic segmentation versus manual reference Second observer versus manual reference
DSC P2C DSC P2C
Endocardium overall 0.91 ± 0.02 2.0 ± 0.4 mm 0.95 ± 0.01 1.2 ± 0.2 mm
Endocardium ED 0.93 ± 0.02 1.8 ± 0.5 mm 0.96 ± 0.01 1.1 ± 0.3 mm
Endocardium ES 0.85 ± 0.04 2.4 ± 0.5 mm 0.92 ± 0.03 1.4 ± 0.3 mm
Epicardium overall 0.93 ± 0.01 2.2 ± 0.4 mm 0.96 ± 0.01 1.2 ± 0.33 mm
Epicardium ED 0.94 ± 0.01 2.0 ± 0.5 mm 0.97 ± 0.01 1.1 ± 0.4 mm
Epicardium ES 0.91 ± 0.02 2.4 ± 0.6 mm 0.95 ± 0.01 1.4 ± 0.4 mm

Difference are expressed as mean ± SD. For a perfect overlap between the regions DSC should be 1 and P2C should be 0. ED = end diastole, ES = end systole.