Table 1.
Detection rates of biliary and vascular structures using fluorescent cholangiography n (%)
| Ref. | Technique | n | CD | CHD | CD-CHD junction | CBD | CA |
| Larsen et al[17] | LC | 35 | 35 (100) | 35 (100) | 35 (100) | 35 (100) | 29 (83.0) |
| Daskalaki et al[19] | RC | 184 | 180 (97.8) | 173 (94.0) | 154 (83.6) | 177 (96.1) | - |
| Dip et al[16] | LC | 45 | 44 (97.7) | 27 (60.0) | - | 36 (80.0) | - |
| Osayi et al[18] | LC | 82 | 78 (95.1) | 57 (69.5) | 63 (76.8) | 63 (76.8) | - |
| Dip et al[20] | LC | 43 | 42 (97.6) | 25 (58.1) | - | 34 (79.1) | - |
| Verbeek et al[21] | LC | 14 | 14 (100) | - | - | - | - |
| Buchs et al[22] | SIRC | 23 | 23 (100) | - | - | - | - |
| Spinoglio et al[23] | SIRC | 45 | 42 (93.0) | 40 (80.0) | 40 (80.0) | 41 (91.0) | - |
| Schols et al[24] | LC | 15 | 15 (100) | - | - | 15 (100) | - |
| Buchs et al[27] | SIRC | 12 | 11 (91.7) | 4 (33.3) | 3 (25.0) | 6 (50.0) | - |
| Kaneko et al[25] | LC | 28 | 26 (92.9) | 27 (96.4) | - | - | 25 (89) |
| Ishizawa et al[28] | SILC | 7 | 5 (71.4) | 7 (100) | 7 (100) | - | 4 (57.1) |
| Aoki et al[30] | LC | 14 | 10 (71.4) | - | - | 10 (71.4) | - |
| Ishizawa et al[32] | LC | 52 | 52 (100) | 50 (96.2) | 50 (96.2) | - | - |
| Ishizawa et al[32] | LC | 1 | 1 (100) | 1 (100) | 1 (100) | - | - |
| Weighted average, % (95%CI) | 96.2 (94.7-97.7) | 78.1 (74.8-81.4) | 72.0 (69.0-75.0) | 86.0 (83.3-88.8) | 69.4 (61.8-77.1) | ||
CA: Cystic artery; CBD: Common bile duct; CD: Cystic duct; CHD: Common hepatic duct; LC: Standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy; RC: Robotic cholecystectomy; SILC: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy; SIRC: Single-incision roboticcholecystectomy.