Table 6.
Advantages and disadvantages of non-invasive techniques for the determination of body or carcass composition
| Advantages | Disadvantages | |
|---|---|---|
| Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) | Easy handling Low radiation Medium price Quick data analysis Regional data analysis | Alone 2D information (so far) No direct data for lean meat (in vivo) |
| Computed tomography (CT) | Very high anatomical resolution High speed Whole-body 3D data Automatic data analysis | X-radiation exposure Expensive |
| Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) | Excellent soft tissue differentiation Whole-body 3D data Functional imaging No radiation | Expensive (if high field strength magnet) Rather slow (whole body) Availability (farm animal sector) |
| Ultrasound imaging (US) | Portable, extensive database for some species Reasonably priced No radiation Real time, online No size limit, no sedation/anesthesia | Less accurate anatomical resolution Image analysis not easily automated No whole-body information |