Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 27;200(2):423–430. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.176594

Table 2. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing for 10 genes delivered by microinjection and electroporation.

Microinjection (NOD/ShiLtJ) Electroporation (B6D2F2/J)
Target gene Embryos transferred Mice born Mutant mice Mutant percentage (%) Embryos transferred Mice born Mutant mice Mutant percentage (%)
Cd69 59 23 0 0 29 16 0 0
Cd226 61 19 4 21 20 13 0 0
Clec16a 57 0 NA NA 25 16 2 13
Cyp27b1 64 23 12 52 28 20 0 0
Fut2 64 25 7 28 29 25 9 36
Ormdl3 62 19 17 89 26 15 2 13
Rgs1 62 18 8 44 28 19 5 26
Tlr7 66 22 6 27 30 15 0 0
Tlr8 60 15 1 7 29 22 3 14
Tnfsf9 61 21 15 71 25 14 0 0
Total 616 185 Live birth rate 30% 296 175 Live birth rate 59%

Zygotes were derived from B6D2F2/J and treated with acidic Tyrode’s solution for 10 sec before electroporation. A total of 30 embryos for each target gene were electroporated in a cuvette of 1-mm gap size and in 20 μl of TE/Opti-MEM at 1:1 volume ratio. Following electroporation, the embryos were transferred to 100 μl of M2 media and transferred into pseudopregnent female mice. For each live born mouse, PCR product at the target site was amplified from genomic DNA isolated from tail biopsies and analyzed by Sanger sequencing. Guide sequences for the 10 genes were chosen from the CRISPR Design software (crispr.mit.edu), targeting in-frame “ATG” downstream from the starting “ATG” if possible, with varied scores ranging from “41” for Cd69 to “90” for Fut2. NA, not applicable.