Table 1. Accuracy of parameter estimates using the composite-likelihood, iHS, and nS_L methods.

Parameters		Composite likelihood				iHS			nSL
Ra	α	Statistical power (%)b	$\widehat{\text{α}}$ mean ± SD	$\widehat{x}$ deviation mean (median)c	Exact site detected (%)d	Statistical power (%)b	$\widehat{x}$ deviation mean (median)c	Exact site detected (%)d	Statistical power (%)b	$\widehat{x}$ deviation mean (median)c	Exact site detected (%)d
		Using both polymorphic and monomorphic sites
2000	1000	57 (17)	1160 ± 660	3.68 (1.73)	9.23 [10.9]	24	5.67 (2.91)	4.92 [5.29]	41	4.72 (2.23)	11.1 [13.1]
	2000	86 (36)	2070 ± 920	4.11 (2.43)	10.6 [12.7]	63	6.18 (4.05)	3.54 [3.22]	63	5.01 (2.95)	9.4 [11.4]
	4000	97 (30)	3850 ± 1780	6.03 (3.92)	9.07 [10.7]	89	8.58 (6.09)	2.61 [2.23]	76	7.10 (4.45)	6.9 [7.0]
4000	1000	35 (16)	1290 ± 840	2.92 (0.95)	15.6 [20.4]	9.6	5.71 (1.80)	7.37 [9.00]	42	3.36 (1.21)	18.6 [24.5]
	2000	75 (40)	2290 ± 1000	2.51 (1.39)	15.9 [19.2]	41	3.98 (2.30)	5.46 [6.58]	73	2.77 (1.62)	16.3 [17.1]
	4000	94 (48)	4030 ± 1610	3.56 (2.20)	13.8 [16.7]	78	5.12 (3.45)	3.90 [4.29]	87	3.66 (2.35)	12.6 [12.4]
		Using only polymorphic sites
4000	1000	4.0	860 ± 950	3.62	13.3
	2000	36	1630 ± 1010	3.21	13.3
	4000	82	3290 ± 1870	4.91	10.3

^aScaled recombination rate (4Nr) across the 100-k-long simulated sequence.

^bPercentages of simulated samples that yield P < 0.001. In parentheses: using an adjusted recombination rate in neutral simulations to yield mean LD identical to that of data to be analyzed.

^cMean (median) deviation in kilobases of the estimated location of selection from the true location (x = 50,000): $|\widehat{x}-50,000|\times {10}^{-3}.$

^dPercentages of simulated samples for which $\widehat{x}$ = 50,000. Those of samples in which the frequency of the beneficial allele is exactly 10 are given in brackets.