Table 2.
Models | Oxidative stress measures | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Isoprostane (ng/ml) | 8-OH-dG (ng/ml) | |||
| ||||
Unadjusted β [95% CI]2 | Adjusted β [95% CI]3,4 | Unadjusted β [95% CI]2 | Adjusted β [95% CI]3,4 | |
Model 1- BLL | ||||
BLL, μg/dL | 0.08 [−0.001, 0.16]* | 0.09 [−0.01, 0.19]* | −0.15 [−2.42, 2.11] | 1.16 [−1.64, 3.62] |
Model 2- vitamin C and zinc intake5 | ||||
Vitamin C, mg/d | ||||
1st tertile | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
2nd tertile | 0.02 [−0.42, 0.46] | −0.26 [−0.74, 0.21] | 7.90 [−4.91, 20.71] | −0.79 [−14.36, 12.77] |
3rd tertile | −0.15 [−0.59, 0.28] | −0.23[−0.69, 0.23] | −1.44 [−14.04, 11.15] | 0.67 [−12.68, 14.02] |
Zinc, mg/d | ||||
1st tertile | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
2nd tertile | −0.09 [−0.53, 0.34] | −0.12 [−0.61, 0.37] | −3.85 [−17.16, 9.46] | −2.54 [−15.92, 10.84] |
3rd tertile | −0.11 [−0.55, 0.33] | −0.21 [−0.71, 0.29] | −16.39 [−29.21, − 3.58]*** | −13.51 [−27.18, 1.88]* |
Model 3- main effects: BLL & vitamin C6 | ||||
BLL | 0.09 [0.01, 0.18]** | 0.10 [0.01, 0.19]** | 0.24 [−2.54, 2.06] | 0.37 [−2.26, 3.01] |
Vitamin C | ||||
1st tertile | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
2nd tertile | −0.06 [−0.50, 0.37] | −0.27[−0.73, 0.19] | 3.85 [−8.47, 6.18] | 2.25 [−7.85, 9.33] |
3rd tertile | −0.25 [−0.68, 0.19] | −0.32[−0.77, 0.12] | 0.45 [−11.63, 2.45] | 3.16 [−4.27, 14.42] |
Model 4- main effects: BLL & zinc7 | ||||
BLL | 0.09 [0.01, 0.17]** | 0.09 [0.01, 0.18]** | −0.16 [−2.43, 2.11] | 0.26 [−2.33, 2.86] |
Zinc | ||||
1st tertile | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref |
2nd tertile | 0.01 [−0.43, 0.44] | 0.20 [−0.27, 0.66] | −2.80 [−15.22, 9.61] | −2.37 [−13.24, 11.26] |
3rd tertile | −0.02 [−0.46, 0.41] | 0.10 [−0.37, 0.56] | −17.12 [−29.31, − 4.90]*** | −14.15 [−23.31, − 0.67]** |
complete-case analysis
results from univariate regression models. Model 1: n= 173 (isoprostane), n= 175 (8-OH-dG); Models 2–4: n= 164 (isoprostane), n= 166 (8-OH-dG)
results from multivariate regression models. Model 1: n= 139 (isoprostane), n= 141 (8-OH-dG). Models 2–4: n= 133 (isoprostane), n= 135 (8-OH-dG)
models adjusted for family possession of luxury items (≤8 vs >8 items), parental involvement of jobs with potential for metal exposure (not involved vs involved), crowding at home (no. of people/room), mother’s smoking (no vs yes), BMI (kg/m2) and CRP-adjusted ferritin concentration (ng/mL)
values adjusted for total energy intake by residual method (Willett et a., 1997)
interactions between BLL and vit C were not significant. Models were rerun to test the main effects of BLL and vit C
interactions between BLL and zinc were not significant. Models were rerun to test the main effects of BLL and zinc
p< 0.01
p< 0.05
p< 0.1