Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 6.
Published in final edited form as: Environ Res. 2015 Jun 11;140:641–648. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.05.022

Table 3.

Summary of HM mortality results using GAM models

All subjects n=509 (172 cases) Women n=254 (87 cases)
Crude Adjusteda Crude Adjustedb
OR range 0.7 – 1.6 0.7 – 1.7 0.3 – 2.8 0.2 – 3.0
Optimal Span size 0.95 0.95 0.70 0.65
Global p-value 0.41 0.17 0.02 0.01
Figure 2a 2b 3a 3b
All subjects with interview n=350 (101 cases) Women with interview n= 172 (49 cases)
Crude Adjustedc Crude Adjustedd
OR range 0.7 – 2.9 0.6 – 3.2 0.4 – 3.5 0.4 – 3.56
Optimal Span size 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Global p-value 0.22 0.13 0.09 0.07
Figure 5a 5b 6a 6b
a

Adjusted for sex, age and distance to the nearest power line.

b

Adjusted for age and distance to nearest power line.

c

Adjusted for sex, age, smoking and proximity to petrol station.

d

Adjusted for sex, age and proximity to petrol station.