Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0131558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131558

Table 1. Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis.

Prevention Group Control Group
Studies Risk Factor Co-administration Course n Drug Usage Ulcer/ Erosion(%) Bleeding (%) n Drug Usage Ulcer/ Erosion(%) Bleeding (%)
Ng 2010[48] Ulcer or erosions no 48w 65 pantoprazole 20 mg bid 0 (0) 0 (0) 65 famotidine 40mg bid 8 (12.3) 5 (7.7)
Ng 2012[49] ACS or MI Clopidogrel and anticoagulant 4-52w 163 esomeprazole 20 mg qd 1 (0.6) 3 (1.8) 148 famotidine 40 mg qd 6 (4.1) 12 (8.1)
Yano 2012[50] ACS Clopidogrel 12m 65 Omeprazole 10 mg qd - 3(4.6) 65 famotidine 20 mg qd - 1(1.5)
Guo M 2009[51] Not clear no 90d 42 Omeprazole or esomeprazole 20 mg qd 6 (14.3) - 22 famotidine 20 mg bid 5 (22.7) -
Sun RR 2012[52] Elders no 90d 40 rabeprazole 20 mg qd 3 (7.5) 0 (0) 40 ranitidine 150mg bid 11 (27.5) 1(2.5)
Wang YP 2012[53] HP-, no ulcer history no 90d 23 lansoprazole 30 mg qd 2 (8.7) 0 (0) 22 famotidine 20 mg bid 6 (27.3) 1(4.5)
Hu L 2012[54] Not clear no 90d 50 rabeprazole 10 mg qd 5(10) - 48 famotidine 20 mg bid 9 (18.8) -
Lu BJ 2013[55] ACS Clopidogrel 30d 50 omeprazole 40mg qd - 2(4) 50 ranitidine 150 mg bid - 9(18)
Wang J 2012[56] ACS Clopidogrel 90d 43 esomeprazole 20mg bid 3 (7.0) - 46 famotidine 20 mg bid 5 (10.9) -

ACS:acute coronary syndrome; MI:myocardial infarction