. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0132538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132538

Table 4. The summed ranking of the different weighting techniques and similarity / clustering techniques employed.

	1^st	2^nd	3^rd	4^th
Weighting	Bell = 19	Inverse = 26	Integration = 33	Unweighted = 58
Similarity / Clustering (incl. unweighted data)	K2 = 6 (19)	J = 20 (34)	S = 24 (40)	PAE = 28 (43)

Summed ranking values were calculated from Table 3. Lower scores (summed placements) indicates a higher ranking. J = Jaccard, K2 = Kulczinsky2, S = Simpson.