Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 6;10(7):e0131602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131602

Table 3. Pooled Test Performance of the Studies Included in the Meta-Analysis.

Test No.of reports Pooled SE(95%CI) Pooled SPE(95%CI) Pooled PLR(95%CI) Pooled NLR(95%CI) Diagnostic Odds Ratio AUC(95%CI)
Kind of mycosis Candidiasis 4 0.80(0.67,0.90) 0.77(0.67,0.89) 3.58(1.22,6.87) 0.26(0.10,0.57) 25.43(13.101,49.86) 0.88(0.83,0.98)
Aspergillosis 6 0.73(0.62,0.86) 0.81(0.64,0.85) 5.57(3.89,6.23) 0.34(0.12,0.48) 23.15(10.4,58.90) 0.85(0.70,0.95)
Assay type the Fungitell assay only 6 0.82(0.68,0.90) 0.86(0.77,0.92) 5.69(3.46,9.35) 0.22(0.12,0.39) 26.52(11.72,60.07) 0.90(0.88,0.93)
Pooled studiesa 11 0.75(0.63,0.84) 0.87(0.81,0.92) 5.85(3.96,8.63) 0.30(0.20,0.45) 19.53(11.16,34.18) 0.89(0.86,0.91)

NLR, negative likelihood ratio; PLR, positive likelihood ratio; DOR, Diagnostic Odds Ratio; AUC, the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve;a:I2 = 74.35%,95% CI:59.87–98.33%