Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 7;4:324. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1049-9

Table 2.

Distribution of affected subjects by MetS components composition

Men (N = 838) Women (N = 1,121) All (N = 1,959)
N % N % N %
BP + HDL + TRIG* 241 28.76 132 11.78 373 19.04
BP + HDL + GLU* 44 5.25 18 1.61 62 3.16
BP + HDL + WAIST* 68 8.11 269 24 337 17.2
BP + TRIG + GLU 53 6.32 10 0.89 63 3.22
BP + TRIG + WAIST 52 6.21 62 5.53 114 5.82
BP + GLU + WAIST 79 9.43 121 10.79 200 10.21
HDL + TRIG + GLU 15 1.79 7 0.62 22 1.12
HDL + TRIG + WAIST* 10 1.19 48 4.28 58 2.96
HDL + GLU + WAIST 1 0.12 14 1.25 15 0.77
TRIG + GLU + WAIST 2 0.24 3 0.27 5 0.26
BP + HDL + TRIG + GLU* 72 8.59 26 2.32 98 5
BP + HDL + TRIG + WAIST* 76 9.07 190 16.95 266 13.58
BP + HDL + GLU + WAIST 24 2.86 77 6.87 101 5.16
BP + TRIG + GLU + WAIST 30 3.58 20 1.78 50 2.55
HDL + TRIG + GLU + WAIST 7 0.84 7 0.62 14 0.71
BP + HDL + WAIST + TRIG + GLU 64 7.64 117 10.44 181 9.24

BP blood pressure, GLU fasting plasma glucose, HDL high density lipoprotein cholesterol, TRIG triglycerides, WAIST waist circumference.

p < 0.05 for difference of affected subjects’ proportions in men and women, two sided Chi square test.