Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 17;6(2):400–417. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-01-RA-0002

Table 2.

The intra-rater and inter-rater assessments of the major line bisection test variable, percent deviation, and comparisons of LBT duration, assessment duration, and neglected lines for the patient group with unilateral visual neglect (NG).

Intra-rater variables (n = 11) E-system (Mean ± SD) Rater (Mean ± SD) p-value ES CCC (95% CI)
Test
LBT duration (sec) 106.78 ± 28.81
E-system vs. Rater 1 (%) 5.94 ± 5.28 4.55 ± 4.18 .07 .29 .84 (.59 to .95)**
E-system vs. Rater 2 (%) 5.94 ± 5.28* 4.49 ± 4.24* .02 .30 .89 (.70 to .96)**
Rater 1 vs. Rater 2 (%) 4.55 ± 4.18 4.49 ± 4.24 .91 .02 .89 (.66 to .97)**
Retest
LBT duration (sec) 119.19 ± 68.34
E-system vs. Rater 1 (%) 5.61 ± 5.59* 4.68 ± 5.51 .01 .17 .97 (.90 to .99)**
E-system vs. Rater 2 (%) 5.61 ± 5.59 5.00 ± 5.38 .13 .11 .97 (.89 to .99)**
Rater 1 vs. Rater 2 (%) 4.68 ± 5.51 5.00 ± 5.38 .35 .06 .98 (.92 to .99)**
Inter-rater variables (n = 11) Test (Mean ± SD) Retest (Mean ± SD) p-value ES ICC (95% CI)
E-system
Assessment duration (sec) 0 0
Neglected lines (each) 2.27 ± 2.65 2.91 ± 2.55
Deviation (%) 5.94 ± 5.28 5.61 ± 5.59 .80 .06 .84 (.40 to .96)††
Rater 1
Assessment duration (sec) 237.91 ± 35.26 231.18 ± 50.86
Neglected lines (each) .73 ± 1.68 .73 ± 1.68
Deviation (%) 4.55 ± 4.18 4.68 ± 5.51 .91 .03 .84 (.41 to .96)††
Rater 2
Assessment duration (sec) 229.82 ± 36.57 232.27 ± 48.75
Neglected lines (each) 1.00 ± 2.49 .82 ± 1.94
Deviation (%) 4.49 ± 4.24 5.00 ± 5.38 .54 .11 .91 (.68 to .98)††

ES: effect size, CI: confidence interval: CCC: concordance correlation coefficient, ICC: intra-class correlation coefficient. The symbols next to the values indicate following meanings:

* Significant level of p <0.01

** Significant level, p <0.001.