Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 17;6(2):400–417. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2015-01-RA-0002

Table 3.

The intra-rater assessments on the major line bisection test variable, percent deviation, and comparisons of assessment duration and neglected lines for the cognitively healthy group with modified e-system (HGm)

Intra-rater variables (HGc = 11) E-system (Mean ± SD) Rater (Mean ± SD) p-value B-A diff.(95% LOA) ES CCC (95% CI)
Percent deviation (%) E-system vs. Rater 1 2.85 ± 3.30 2.93 ± 3.11 .86 .06 (-.96 to .87) .05 .90 (.67 to .97)**
Assessment duration (sec) 0 0
Neglected lines (each) 0 0
Percent deviation (%)E-system vs. Rater 2 2.85 ± 3.30 2.79 ± 3.26 .82 .01 (-.55 to .56) .11 .96 (.88 to .99)**
Assessment duration (sec) 269.80 ± 107.89 272.20 ± 107.54
Neglected lines (each) 0 0
Percent deviation (%)Rater 1 vs. Rater 2 2.93 ± 3.11 2.79 ± 3.26 .73 .06 (-.76 to .89) .04 .92 (.73 to .98)**
Assessment duration (sec) 283.80 ± 58.16 287.50 ± 65.70
Neglected lines (each) 0 0

ES: effect size, CI: confidence interval: CCC: concordance correlation coefficient, ICC: intra-class correlation coefficient, B-A diff.: Bland Altman mean difference or bias, LOA: Limit of agreement (mean difference with 95% CI). The symbols next to the values indicate following meanings:

*Significant level of p <0.01

**Significant level, p <0.001.