Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 7;5:11940. doi: 10.1038/srep11940

Table 1. Performance of 3 sole encoding schemes on different size of dataset.

Method (+) sites (−) sites Ratio Sn (%) Sp (%) ACC (%) MCC
AF 112 127 0.88:1 67.20 66.13 69.51 0.403
  365 370 0.99:1 72.00 73.07 75.11 0.461
  853 937 0.91:1 68.31 69.43 72.30 0.408
  1530 1630 0.94:1 69.37 68.21 70.15 0.391
  2107 2018 1.04:1 75.33 76.86 74.94 0.477
KNN 112 127 0.88:1 57.00 52.3 58.29 0.237
  365 370 0.99:1 60.14 58.12 59.50 0.281
  853 937 0.91:1 68.22 63.10 67.20 0.306
  1530 1630 0.94:1 68.73 65.16 69.75 0.362
  2107 2018 1.04:1 75.35 71.03 72.39 0.407
CKSAAP 112 127 0.88:1 82.77 80.30 83.37 0.633
  365 370 0.99:1 82.27 80.63 82.84 0.617
  853 937 0.91:1 81.02 80.12 81.27 0.623
  1530 1630 0.94:1 77.84 79.70 80.56 0.612
  2107 2018 1.04:1 80.02 79.33 80.41 0.605